Teams

CC Sinsheimer Meertens

2026 USTA CC Spring Adult 55 & OVER · CC USTA 55 & Over 7.0W

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-12vs CC Trilogy EdryWon 20
W#2 DoublesDeborah Beatty / Idona Cabrinha vs Gail Edry / June McCullough6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTeresa Schmutte / Jennifer Manduffie vs Ramona Cabiles / Olivia Bolanos4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-27vs CC Trilogy EdryLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Meertens / Teresa Schmutte vs Ramona Cabiles / Olivia Bolanos3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDeborah Beatty / Morri Nash vs June McCullough / Beverley Dunn2-6, 2-6
2026-06-20vs CC - LLW - SLO High FiversSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDeborah Beatty / Morri Nash vs Tami Rose / Stephanie Ventura2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Meertens / Jennifer Manduffie vs Roberta Fischer / Myki Keffury4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-13vs CC Avila LynamLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Meertens / Teresa Schmutte vs Deborah VANDENBERG / Janet Holland2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Beatty / Morri Nash vs Marie Murphy / Deborah Cherry1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-06-07vs CC Trilogy EdryWon 21
L#1 DoublesTeresa Schmutte / Bonnie Lyons vs Christine Sweeney / Melanie Topp5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKaren Meertens / Diane Raj vs Stacie Reeve / Olivia Bolanos6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMorri Nash / Deborah Beatty vs Trish Ross / Heather Harper7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2026-06-03vs CC - LLW - SLO High FiversLost 02
L#1 DoublesDiane Raj / Idona Cabrinha vs Dede Bodnar / Jean Kennedy0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Hostetter / Deborah Beatty vs Stephanie Ventura / Tami Rose1-6, 2-6
2026-05-17vs CC Avila LynamWon 21
L#1 DoublesSally Loker / Teresa Schmutte vs Paula Olson / Deborah VANDENBERG3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAnnette Adamski / Diane Raj vs Deborah Cherry / Janet Holland7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPamela Hostetter / Morri Nash vs Ann Brewer / Gretel Crum6-1, 6-4
2026-05-03vs CC - LLW - SLO High FiversWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Meertens / Idona Cabrinha vs Dede Bodnar / Tracy Hanly1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAnnette Adamski / Teresa Schmutte vs Roberta Fischer / Ann Paredes6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPamela Hostetter / Morri Nash vs Heather Loveman-Krelle / Amy Stets6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2026-05-01vs CC Avila LynamWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnnette Adamski / Diane Raj vs Paula Olson / Deborah VANDENBERG3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSally Loker / Idona Cabrinha vs Lisa Corrente / Deborah Cherry6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Meertens / Jennifer Manduffie vs Colleen Moss / Lori Bickel4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · CC USTA 55 & Over 7.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CC - LLW - SLO High Fivers8122514156
2CC Sinsheimer Meertens54121540294
3CC Trilogy Edry36111637268
4CC Avila Lynam2791838266

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Annette Adamski
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Deborah Beatty
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Idona Cabrinha
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.07
Teresa Schmutte
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.00
Pamela Hostetter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Morri Nash
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.92
Jennifer Manduffie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Meertens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sally Loker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Meertens + Deborah Beatty3448% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Hostetter + Morri Nash5158% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Hostetter + Jennifer Manduffie134 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Schmutte + Deborah Beatty314 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Beatty + Morri Nash134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Annette Adamski
2W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Deborah Beatty
11W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
Idona Cabrinha
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Teresa Schmutte
17W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
Pamela Hostetter
16W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
Morri Nash
26W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
2.92
Jennifer Manduffie
39W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Karen Meertens
12W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sally Loker
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.