← Teams

MPRC-Mitchell

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.44 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Susan Suttich
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Laurence Dupray
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.48
Judi Babcock
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.31
Tina Prassas
published 3.5
—
Kristin Bialobok
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
—
Shelly Cruze
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Kathy Cook
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.92
Jane Pinkowski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Jayne Mitchell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results6 ties
2020-03-01Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesJudi Babcock / Laurence Dupray vs Deborah Naugler / Rebecca Martinez Griffin6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Suttich / Kristin Bialobok vs Margo Reifenrath / Wendy Weddle6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKathy Cook vs Marie C Eckert6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Osborne / Jayne Mitchell vs Traci Laurent / Mary Logsdon6-4, 6-2
2020-02-08Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJudi Babcock / Laurence Dupray vs Barbara Hart / Heather Zadow6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Suttich / Kristin Bialobok vs Leslie Lynch / Natasha Rinard4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKathy Cook vs Amie Manske6-0, 6-0
2020-01-31Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesJudi Babcock / Laurence Dupray vs Gretchen Newcomb / Kathleen Sullivan6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNancy Osborne / Shelly Cruze vs Michele Snyder / Lana Lane7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKathy Cook vs Chikako Hokanson7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJane Pinkowski / Kristin Bialobok vs Gena Martinez / Stephnie Bonn6-1, 7-5
2020-01-26Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJudi Babcock / Laurence Dupray vs Katie Chong / Celene Robert6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJane Pinkowski / Kristin Bialobok vs Debbie Frankel / Kimberly Stockstad6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKathy Cook vs Tina Farrelly6-3, 6-1
2020-01-17Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesJudi Babcock / Susan Suttich vs Shari Levelle / Bin He7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKathy Cook vs Anne Brandenburger5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShelly Cruze / Laurence Dupray vs Lily Looi / Weizhen Guo6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRita DeWeese / Jayne Mitchell vs Julie Legassick / Dottie Quinn Jacobs6-3, 6-1
2020-01-11Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesSusan Suttich / Judi Babcock vs Sharr Stark / Julie Kim6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKathy Cook vs Dana Baioni6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNancy Osborne / Shelly Cruze vs Nina Sanna / Deb Garris6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKristin Bialobok / Jayne Mitchell vs April Paris / Cathy Koerner6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Susan Suttich
59W–35L career
9%91%0%
3.65
3.5
Laurence Dupray
114W–71L career
0%81%19%
3.50
3.5
Judi Babcock
128W–57L career
0%85%15%
3.48
3.5
Tina Prassas
24W–8L career
1%97%2%
3.31
3.5
Kristin Bialobok
42W–33L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Shelly Cruze
12W–17L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Kathy Cook
85W–36L career
8%92%0%
3.15
3
Jane Pinkowski
42W–43L career
0%91%9%
2.92
3
Jayne Mitchell
44W–78L career
0%98%2%
2.85

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.