Teams

Dunwoody CC (Melanie Clark)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Weekday Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Sonya Peel)

17 players · average NTRP 3.86 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-06-20Won 10
W#1 SinglesBecca Dill vs Claire Robinson6-0, 6-0
2024-06-13Lost 01
L#1 SinglesBecca Dill vs Danielle Oliver1-6, 6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Sonya Peel) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Angela Laurite
published 4
3.95
Colleyann Flynt
published 4
3.95
Jodi Viau
published
3.83
Tracy Navarro
published
3.81
Elizabeth Steelman
published
3.79
Amy Jardina
published 4
Carrie Turner
published 4
3.67
Lesley Weatherly
published
3.63
Becca Dill
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.56
Ginger Bethune
published
3.54
Melanie Clark
published
3.52
Heather Deguire
published
3.52
Katy Moomaw
published
3.46
Barbara Walsh
published 3.5
3.45
Hayley Brammer
published
3.16
Anna Plyler
published 3.5
Jill Hartigan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Steelman + Barbara Walsh4159% games+13.9% vs expected
Amy Jardina + Tracy Navarro4255% games+6.0% vs expected
Elizabeth Steelman + Colleyann Flynt5073% gamesnot enough data
Heather Deguire + Ginger Bethune134 matchesnot enough data
Jodi Viau + Ginger Bethune134 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Steelman + Ginger Bethune123 matchesnot enough data
Becca Dill + Tracy Navarro213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angela Laurite
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
4.04
4
Colleyann Flynt
14W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
Jodi Viau
6W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
Tracy Navarro
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Elizabeth Steelman
33W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Amy Jardina
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Carrie Turner
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lesley Weatherly
60W–50L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Becca Dill
32W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
Ginger Bethune
11W–18L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
Melanie Clark
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
Heather Deguire
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
Katy Moomaw
3W–14L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Barbara Walsh
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Hayley Brammer
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Anna Plyler
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Jill Hartigan
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.