Teams

Have Fun

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - BOISE · TV

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2021-06-24vs Grip N RipSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPhillip Bowden / Dan Dillard vs Ramanjaneya Siddabattuni / Rajan Patel4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarc Carson / Mark Thomann vs Anil Kukutla / Patrick Moore2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Ryan Cook
published 4
3.46
Chandra Angadi
published 3.5
3.27
Mark Thomann
published
Arunkumar Annamalai
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.22
Michael Polito
published
3.17
Kevin Hoffman
published
3.12
Kyle Polito
published
3.11
Bill Fritz
published 3
Dan Dillard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marc Carson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Phillip Bowden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rick Stoddard
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Hoffman + Ryan Cook13556% games+3.2% vs expected
Michael Polito + Mark Thomann9361% games+1.1% vs expected
Michael Polito + Kyle Polito181950% games−1.3% vs expected
Mark Thomann + Christopher Dirstine8649% games−4.6% vs expected
Phillip Bowden + Kevin Hoffman381060% gamesnot enough data
Dan Dillard + Phillip Bowden17755% gamesnot enough data
Michael Polito + Bill Fritz12262% gamesnot enough data
Phillip Bowden + Ryan Cook12061% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ryan Cook
143W–65L career · no lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Chandra Angadi
124W–131L career · no lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
3.46
Mark Thomann
98W–86L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Arunkumar Annamalai
46W–16L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Polito
61W–50L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
Kevin Hoffman
168W–126L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
Kyle Polito
34W–40L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Christopher Dirstine
36W–53L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Bill Fritz
100W–88L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Dan Dillard
31W–20L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Marc Carson
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Phillip Bowden
144W–67L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Rick Stoddard
100W–107L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.