Teams

V - Rancho Madera Chicks with Sticks

2023 SoCal Doubles 18 &Over - WD · V - Women 3.0 WD

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-30vs V - Pierpont RacquettesLost 01
L#2 DoublesCynthia Clark / Gizelda Parr vs Diana Trinh-Salzer / Lauren Stompe2-6, 0-6
2023-11-17vs V - Valle Lindo Double TroubleWon 10
W#2 DoublesGizelda Parr / Maryam Piroozfar vs Carol Goldreyer / Siobhan O'Donnell0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-11-01vs V - North Ranch Nice AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesGizelda Parr / Joyce Green vs Tracy Collins / Tes MacAraya5-7, 2-6
2023-10-23vs V - Sunset Love HurtsWon 20
W#2 DoublesKathryn Pisaro / Ellen Swagerty vs Heather Kawai / Marcela Cepeda6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGizelda Parr / Ellen Borden vs Sophie Clowes / Marianne Acerboni6-3, 6-3
2023-10-16vs V - Las Posas Shot GirlsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer House / Kimberley Bennett vs Jean Salcido / Michelle Soto de Carvalho6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKathryn Pisaro / Linda Egan vs Janet Talmadge / Penny Teague7-6, 6-2
2023-10-02vs V - Valle Lindo Double TroubleLost 02
L#2 DoublesEllen Swagerty / Kathryn Pisaro vs Anne Renard / Louise Hewitt4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoyce Green / Gizelda Parr vs Stacy Ball / Siobhan O'Donnell1-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for V - Women 3.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Kimberley Bennett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Neda Khavari
published
2.94
Juliette Ormberget
published
2.80
Ellen Swagerty
published 3
2.79
Kathryn Pisaro
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Kimberlin Morley
published
2.63
Joyce Green
published
2.45
Gizelda Parr
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Paula Williams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn Pisaro + Gizelda Parr033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kimberley Bennett
128W–110L career · 1 line in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Neda Khavari
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
Juliette Ormberget
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Ellen Swagerty
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Kathryn Pisaro
74W–90L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.79
Kimberlin Morley
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
Joyce Green
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
2.63
2.5
Gizelda Parr
44W–77L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%66%34%
2.45
Paula Williams
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.