Teams

Richard/Brownfield

2025 South East Tennis Combo 55 & over · Women 7.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-25vs Tatum 7.5 - 55sLost 03
L#1 DoublesPeggy O'Connell / Joan Proctor vs Julianne Assad / Kathleen Graeser5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKelli Brownfield / Karen Wall vs Martha Broadbent / Nancy Utz2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Richard / Sydney Werner vs Cara DAngelo / Shannon Zentmeyer2-6, 5-7
2025-10-07vs McKenna/Doer DAYWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoan Proctor / Peggy O'Connell vs Cindy Antonelli / Luanne Basile6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKaren Wall / Kelli Brownfield vs Josie Whitmore / Dianne McKenna6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCarrie Guerrette / Cheryl Matsche vs Paula Bachman / Joyce Jordan4-6, 5-7
2025-10-06vs Roberson/Kunze (Day)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesPeggy O'Connell / Lisa Williamson vs Kathleen Bradcovich / Birgitta Jonsson-Seal4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelli Brownfield / Karen Wall vs Sarah Martin / Connie Wilson1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Richard / Sydney Werner vs Debbie Canty / Sharon Wesson4-6, 5-7
2025-09-24vs Welch-McCallWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoan Proctor / Peggy O'Connell vs Kelly Ochsner / Jackie Cruse6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Wall / Carrie Guerrette vs Lauren Vollmin / Lara Hanks6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Richard / Lisa Williamson vs Debra Walters / Kendall Welch3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-09-17vs Davidson 55+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesPeggy O'Connell / Joan Proctor vs Denise Vliet / Sarah McKenzie1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBeth OConnor / Karen Wall vs Betty Mahoney / Maureen Fehrs7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKelli Brownfield / Lisa Williamson vs Candy Garrett / Melissa Huffman3-6, 6-7
2025-09-13vs CAMPBELLLost 12
W#1 DoublesPeggy O'Connell / Joan Proctor vs Valerie Schaffer / Kim Byrd7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCatherine Richard / Lisa Williamson vs Lynn Gore / Kris Summers0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBeth OConnor / Karen Wall vs Debra Jones / Alisa Morgan6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-09vs Randall/Weidlein DAYWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Wall / Beth OConnor vs Susan Barry / Lois Randall4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPeggy O'Connell / Joan Proctor vs Susan Wilson / Ann Schuelke6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCatherine Richard / Lisa Williamson vs Tara MacCall / Lisa Toomey4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-08vs Adams 7.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesPeggy O'Connell / Joan Proctor vs Anne Milkes / Nancy Wilcox6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCatherine Richard / Karen Wall vs Sandra King / Angelia Gallimore1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBeth OConnor / Cheryl Matsche vs Jennifer Adams / Ann Carmichael Prior6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Peggy O'Connell
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
3.63
Catherine Richard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.58
Beth OConnor
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.48
Kelli Brownfield
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.42
Carrie Guerrette
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Sydney Werner
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Karen Wall
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.19
Cheryl Matsche
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Joan Proctor
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Karen Fania
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelli Brownfield + Carrie Guerrette11459% games+5.2% vs expected
Joan Proctor + Peggy O'Connell5453% games−9.4% vs expected
Beth OConnor + Karen Wall123 matchesnot enough data
Karen Wall + Kelli Brownfield123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peggy O'Connell
19W–12L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
3.5
Catherine Richard
9W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.63
4
Beth OConnor
8W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.58
Kelli Brownfield
20W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Carrie Guerrette
22W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Sydney Werner
7W–10L career · 9 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Karen Wall
11W–13L career · 12 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Cheryl Matsche
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Joan Proctor
14W–7L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Fania
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.