Teams

LCTA55/Zavada/MPR

55 & Over · 55 & Over 9.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-18vs LCTA55/Elliott/IndependantLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Bailey / Lisa Duckworth vs Amy White / Maria Elliott1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesChristine Zavada / Pam Wilson vs Stacy Lilley / Lisa Alexander6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeannie Golden / Zalayha Maharaj vs Shannon Chase / Jennifer Anderson5-7, 2-6
2025-05-18vs LATA55/SALEEBY/SSPWon 21
W#1 DoublesZalayha Maharaj / Lisa Bailey vs Donna Saleeby / Zivia Kocher6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnastasia Brown / Christine Zavada vs Debra Werdunn / Katherine Andes3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAlice Cooper / Pam Wilson vs Jill Sinegar / Christina Kaye Huff2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-05-17vs HHTL55/Budreau/Long CoveLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlice Cooper / Pam Wilson vs Janice Budreau / Dava Baumann1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJeannie Golden / Zalayha Maharaj vs Tamara Simone / Ann Clark0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Duckworth / Anastasia Brown vs Cindi Reiman / Vicki Nagy2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 9.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alice Cooper
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Cheryl Hay
published 4.5
4.25
Anastasia Brown
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.97
Christine Zavada
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.96
Lisa Duckworth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.77
Jeannie Golden
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Heather Herman
published
Kate Joseph
published
Lisa Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Pam Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Zalayha Maharaj
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Zavada + Zalayha Maharaj044 matchesnot enough data
Kate Joseph + Cheryl Hay033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alice Cooper
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Cheryl Hay
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Anastasia Brown
25W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Christine Zavada
14W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.97
Lisa Duckworth
89W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.96
Jeannie Golden
31W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Heather Herman
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kate Joseph
2W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Bailey
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pam Wilson
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zalayha Maharaj
17W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.