Teams

FCCC

2022 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - NOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-10vs MLFLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Day / Susan Stark vs Debora J Miller / Jean Tonoli0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJane Gronewoller / Ann Davidson vs Pat Athey / Kathy Petersen2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKate Laudon / Nancy Hartley vs Betty Gonzales / Carol Hiller6-4, 6-4
2022-08-03vs HMTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKelly Day / Susan Stark vs Mary Jane Bartley / Christine Richardson4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSara Gilmore / Ann Davidson vs Colleen Muhlbradt / Diane Westlind1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKate Laudon / Jackie Spradley vs Nancy Pflughoeft / Teresa Adsit6-7, 5-7
2022-07-27vs LVTALost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy Hartley / Konnie Kosek vs Karen Pielin / Sue Schneider2-6, 2-6
2022-07-20vs MLFLost 02
L#1 DoublesKate Laudon / Evie Hoeven vs Lorna Coggon / Kathy Petersen1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Day / Debra Hunter vs Marsha Conley / Carol Hiller4-6, 2-6
2022-07-13vs HMTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNancy Hartley / Konnie Kosek vs Ingrid Parsons / Colleen Muhlbradt1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJane Gronewoller / Sara Gilmore vs Linda Berkheim / Ann Smerud6-2, 6-2
2022-07-06vs LVTALost 02
L#1 DoublesKate Laudon / Jackie Spradley vs Priscilla Gill / Debra Olson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEvie Hoeven / Jane Gronewoller vs Adelle Byra / Michele MacHado3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Konnie Kosek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Jane Gronewoller
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Kelly Day
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Evie Hoeven
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Jackie Spradley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kate Laudon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Nancy Hartley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sara Gilmore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Gronewoller + Kelly Day31038% games−7.5% vs expected
Jane Gronewoller + Sara Gilmore123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Konnie Kosek
34W–77L career · 2 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Jane Gronewoller
72W–80L career · 3 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Kelly Day
22W–42L career · 3 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
Evie Hoeven
0W–5L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jackie Spradley
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kate Laudon
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Hartley
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sara Gilmore
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.