Teams

Avon Grove

Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.5 Men - Evening

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / DELAWARE

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-03-07vs SmashersLost 13
L#1 DoublesTodd Hanks / Andrew Slowik vs Amith Nikam / Selvam Mascarenhas4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesWout Meeuwissen vs Shamoor Anis6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSteve Chang / Steve Hu vs Greg Volz / Kevin Chapman6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDan Myers / Brian Miller vs Sumit Agarwal / Jamil Khatri2-6, 1-6
2022-03-05vs Grip and RipLost 12
L#1 DoublesThomas Craft / David Stosic vs Jeff Long / Gary Pogue4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesWout Meeuwissen vs Eric Voigt4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrian Miller / Dan Myers vs Chintan Dholakia / Stephen Butler1-6, 0-6
2022-02-24vs Inspiring Open StanzaSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAndrew Slowik / Todd Hanks vs Daniel Hewitt / Kyle McDuffie6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesWout Meeuwissen vs Armando Gomez7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesSteve Hu / Steve Chang vs Charles Harrison / Derik Zhou7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJohn Carpenter / Dan Myers vs Rammohan Paripelly / Karthik Govindaswamy3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-02-21vs LeidaLost 12
W#1 DoublesThomas Craft / Wout Meeuwissen vs John Casanova / William Downs6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTodd Hanks / David Prosser vs Anthony Boswell / Scott Smith0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDan Myers / Brian Miller vs Abhijit Jadhav / Jai Wright3-6, 3-6
2022-02-07vs SmashersLost 13
L#1 DoublesDan Myers / Steve Hu vs Amith Nikam / Selvam Mascarenhas0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesWout Meeuwissen vs Shamoor Anis3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesThomas Craft / Andrew Slowik vs Jamil Khatri / Rytas Vebeliunas6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDavid Stosic / David Prosser vs Greg Volz / Nathan Volz2-6, 1-6
2022-01-17vs Grip and RipLost 03
L#1 DoublesWout Meeuwissen / Todd Hanks vs Robert Loan / Don Houpt4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDan Myers / Andrew Slowik vs Stephen Butler / Gary Pogue3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Prosser / David Stosic vs Tariq Quraishi / Prasun Sharma2-6, 4-6
2021-12-20vs Inspiring Open StanzaWon 21
W#1 DoublesWout Meeuwissen / Todd Hanks vs Karthik Govindaswamy / Rammohan Paripelly6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSteve Chang / Steve Hu vs Armando Gomez / Derik Zhou6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAndrew Slowik / David Prosser vs Charles Harrison / Daniel Hewitt3-6, 4-2, 0-1
2021-12-11vs WatermenLost 03
L#1 DoublesSteve Chang / Steve Hu vs Santosh Gaikwad / Neil McNair Jr2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesThomas Craft / John Carpenter vs Frank Gigliotti / Peter Gaertner6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Prosser / Dan Myers vs Ron Teixeira / Andrew Hines3-6, 2-6
2021-11-22vs WatermenLost 03
L#1 DoublesWout Meeuwissen / Mike Nardozzi vs Peter Gaertner / Santosh Gaikwad1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesThomas Craft vs Cooper Bowers0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSteve Chang / Dan Myers vs Frank Gigliotti / Neil McNair Jr0-6, 3-6
2021-11-08vs LeidaWon 21
L#1 DoublesTodd Hanks / Mike Nardozzi vs Anthony Boswell / Peter Leida2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesWout Meeuwissen vs Sefton Morris6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSteve Hu / Andrew Slowik vs Scott Smith / Robert Volko6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men - Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Wout Meeuwissen
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
3.23
Mike Nardozzi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Steve Chang
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.10
Thomas Craft
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.09
Andrew Slowik
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Dan Myers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
David Prosser
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3
David Stosic
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Todd Hanks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Prosser + David Stosic1932% games+1.1% vs expected
Mike Nardozzi + Andrew Slowik6849% games−0.1% vs expected
Wout Meeuwissen + Thomas Craft6552% games−3.0% vs expected
Mike Nardozzi + Thomas Craft134 matchesnot enough data
Steve Chang + Thomas Craft213 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Slowik + Thomas Craft213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wout Meeuwissen
62W–53L career · 9 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.67
Mike Nardozzi
22W–38L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Steve Chang
57W–47L career · 5 lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.17
Thomas Craft
58W–79L career · 5 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Andrew Slowik
24W–40L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%25%75%
3.09
3
Dan Myers
11W–29L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
David Prosser
34W–64L career · 11 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
David Stosic
18W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Todd Hanks
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.