Teams

KC-RH NAVY

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs SKY REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesBryan DesMarteau / Matthew Moore vs John Camins / Jon Kalstein6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesProsper Wang vs Ken Gooden6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMcCory James / Jason Wolfe vs Tim Godzich / Eric Brummond2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBlake Adams / Ronald Kaufman vs John Sanders / Jason Dewees6-2, 7-5
2026-07-06vs EM NAVYSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDamon Cable / Matthew Moore vs Andy Wurst / Ricky Casady3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesProsper Wang vs Mark Leher7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAudie Rubin / Jake Cerra vs David Tenner / Greg Eiselein5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBryan DesMarteau / Ronald Kaufman vs Tim McWhite / Mike Mohrman3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-29vs HV NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesProsper Wang / Andrew Hindes vs Brian Martorella / Tim Boyer6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesDamon Cable vs Brett Wiesler2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRonald Kaufman / Matthew Moore vs John Duhig / Rok Kopp6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBryan DesMarteau / McCory James vs Marcus Barela / Richard Oliver6-2, 6-0
2026-06-22vs HRCA-N REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBlake Adams / Andrew Hindes vs Andy Fishering / Ross Billows6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRonald Kaufman vs Dan Cichy1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJason Wolfe / Bryan DesMarteau vs Abel Ramon / Gregory Weaver6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAudie Rubin / Jake Cerra vs Nathaniel Morgan / Jeffrey Burton6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-06-15vs SS-D ORANGEWon 31
W#1 DoublesMatthew Moore / Damon Cable vs Ben White / Bruce Ohman6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMcCory James vs Jeremy Rivera4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBryan DesMarteau / Andrew Hindes vs Michael Kapoor / Mike Lewis6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAudie Rubin / Jason Wolfe vs Alanj Miller / Jon Trussler6-0, 6-1
2026-06-08vs WC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesDamon Cable / Matthew Moore vs Michael Hines / Alex Cheng6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesProsper Wang vs Kiril Naoumov3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJake Cerra / Scott Adams vs Chris Kiker / Troy Corrente6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBlake Adams / Jason Wolfe vs Benjamin Aldridge / Joel Tyus6-1, 6-0
2026-06-01vs KC-CC GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesProsper Wang / Andrew Hindes vs Dan Strietelmeier / Elliot Lowe6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesRonald Kaufman vs Ryan Scully2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAudie Rubin / Damon Cable vs Richard Frisz / Lance MCHUGH6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJason Wolfe / Jake Cerra vs David Valenciano / Stephen Winkler6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Andrew Hindes
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.97
McCory James
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Prosper Wang
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.96
Bryan DesMarteau
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.86
Damon Cable
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.85
Ronald Kaufman
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.76
Jason Wolfe
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.75
Jake Cerra
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
Blake Adams
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Audie Rubin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Kiet Killion
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bryan DesMarteau + Damon Cable3352% games+3.8% vs expected
Audie Rubin + Bryan DesMarteau5254% gamesnot enough data
Jason Wolfe + Bryan DesMarteau4162% gamesnot enough data
Audie Rubin + Damon Cable224 matchesnot enough data
Audie Rubin + Blake Adams314 matchesnot enough data
Blake Adams + Andrew Hindes314 matchesnot enough data
McCory James + Blake Adams213 matchesnot enough data
Prosper Wang + Andrew Hindes303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Andrew Hindes
20W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
McCory James
9W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Prosper Wang
11W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Bryan DesMarteau
55W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Damon Cable
40W–44L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
Ronald Kaufman
20W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.85
Jason Wolfe
12W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
2.76
Jake Cerra
8W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Blake Adams
13W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Audie Rubin
52W–51L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
2.63
Kiet Killion
7W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.