Teams

BC-MCC/EricSmith

2022 ADULT 18 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Men - 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-25vs BC-BJKTC/KazKataokaLost 02
L#1 SinglesAndrew Radden vs Steve Baek2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJeff Brothers / Remco Waller vs Andre Law / Yuma Tachibana3-6, 4-6
2022-05-14vs BC-WestEnd/RogerKodaniWon 20
W#1 DoublesEric Smith / Andrew Radden vs Michael Avila / Matthew Willson6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJeff Brothers / Remco Waller vs Roger Kodani / Koichi Ishihara6-2, 6-4
2022-05-07vs BC-Kramer/JoePiccirilloLost 01
L#1 DoublesTim Crawmer / Andrew Radden vs Brian Beach / Wade Murphy6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2022-04-30vs BC-IndependencePark/RafaelHerreraLost 01
L#2 DoublesRemco Waller / Eric Knudson vs Ismael Soria / Joan Cruells1-6, 3-6
2022-04-23vs BC-LLW-WestEnd/KeithOshiroLost 01
L#1 DoublesJason Manasse / Andrew Radden vs Phil Chidester / Evan Mobley2-6, 4-6
2022-04-02vs BC-PVTC/JeromeHaigSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEdward Han / Andrew Radden vs Joshua Chou / Kurt Kredel6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEric Knudson / Remco Waller vs Thomas Aguilar / Jeffrey Lee6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.62
Tim Crawmer
published 4.5
4.30
Andrew Radden
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.27
Brent Buchsbaum
published 4.5
Abe Wong
published 4.5
Adam Johnson
published 4.5
4.24
Henry Coia
published 4.5
4.24
Jason Manasse
published
4.17
Ross Wooldridge
published
4.16
David Niehaus
published 4.5
3.57
Matt Witherell
published
Remco Waller
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Radden + Jason Manasse3343% games−7.6% vs expected
Andrew Radden + David Niehaus303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Tim Crawmer
26W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%17%83%
4.62
4.5
Andrew Radden
67W–56L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.30
4.5
Brent Buchsbaum
2W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Abe Wong
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Adam Johnson
no matches on record · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Henry Coia
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
Jason Manasse
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
Ross Wooldridge
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
4.17
4.5
David Niehaus
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.16
Matt Witherell
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
Remco Waller
35W–36L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.