Teams

GEPTA-4.0-Adult/18+M(Dominguez)(EPTC#5)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP 3.83 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Ezri Navarro
usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #1 Singles 23% · published 4
3.72
Elzie Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.22
Roger Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.98
Jacob Saavedra
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jon Saenz
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Luis Dominguez
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
Manuel Barrera
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Martin Lechuga
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Bezemek
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Oswaldo Rojas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ray Bonds
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
Robert Saucedo
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Sebastian Mayo
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Steven Haynes
usually #2 Doubles 37%, also #1 Doubles 37% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roger Gonzalez + Elzie Johnson3353% games+13.0% vs expected
Steven Haynes + Michael Bezemek5849% games−3.0% vs expected
Manuel Barrera + Luis Dominguez17558% gamesnot enough data
Steven Haynes + Ray Bonds3354% gamesnot enough data
Martin Lechuga + Steven Haynes2353% gamesnot enough data
Michael Bezemek + Luis Dominguez3257% gamesnot enough data
Steven Haynes + Luis Dominguez224 matchesnot enough data
Michael Bezemek + Jon Saenz314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ezri Navarro
27W–8L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Elzie Johnson
130W–76L career · 26 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
Roger Gonzalez
85W–60L career · 17 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Jacob Saavedra
23W–61L career · 2 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
Jon Saenz
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Luis Dominguez
63W–49L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Manuel Barrera
47W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Martin Lechuga
22W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Bezemek
102W–87L career · 28 lines in 2025
not enough data
Oswaldo Rojas
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ray Bonds
67W–58L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Saucedo
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sebastian Mayo
5W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steven Haynes
80W–58L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.