Teams

*3-SRyan-CHTC

2024 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-04-29vs *13-RGildehaus-YMCA-40Lost 02
L#2 DoublesGary Glish / Richard Henderson vs David Holub / Ed Holub6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTimothy Buckley / Adam Strom vs Ralph Gildehaus / John Nealis5-7, 2-6
2024-04-22vs *9-PBream-UNCLost 01
L#3 DoublesGary Glish / Richard Henderson vs Michael Meyers / Ted Bohlin2-6, 0-6
2024-04-15vs *1-KRamaswamy-EnoLost 02
L#1 SinglesAdam Strom vs Kiran Ramaswamy4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRandy Cubrilovic / Gary Glish vs Nitni Agrawal / Bharat Awasthi3-6, 2-6
2024-04-08vs *6-KRosenkrantz-CHTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesGary Glish / Adam Strom vs Mark Bland / Mike Hickey7-6, 6-3
2024-04-01vs *10-MSears-DFCWon 10
W#1 DoublesGary Glish / Scott Williams vs Evan Fuguet / Andrew Parker6-2, 6-1
2024-03-25vs *12-MCurry-SVCWon 10
W#2 DoublesBob Stocking / Adam Strom vs Gustaf Bjorkman / Leon Malahias6-3, 6-1
2024-03-18vs *8 MHansen-HVCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesTimothy Buckley / Gary Glish vs Andy Albright / Evan Selig6-0, 7-5
2024-03-04vs *4-VStiebris-HS-40 3.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesGary Glish / Adam Strom vs David Stefan / David Evert6-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Terrence Tan
published
3.41
Adam Strom
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.40
Randy Cubrilovic
published
3.32
Dan Tudor
published 3.5
3.29
Bob Stocking
published 3.5
3.27
Gary Glish
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.21
Timothy Buckley
published
Stephen Ryan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adam Strom + Bob Stocking6161% games+10.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Terrence Tan
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66
3.5
Adam Strom
23W–22L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
Randy Cubrilovic
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Dan Tudor
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Bob Stocking
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Gary Glish
140W–124L career · 7 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Timothy Buckley
16W–10L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
Stephen Ryan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.