Teams

LTC:Beaulieu

2023 WMA Tri-Level Spring (2023) · 3.5 Women 1

4 players · average NTRP / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesMarie Sattler / Louise Sterling vs Anita Hoag / Patricia Coffey3-6, 2-5
2023-06-19vs LTC:Tudryn/RuellLost 01
L#1 DoublesNoreen Little / Moira Donoghue vs Cheryl Ruell / Wendy Touchette6-7, 3-2, 0-1
W#1 DoublesMarie Sattler / Moira Donoghue vs Ruth Critcher / Katherine Desmond6-3, 6-4
2023-05-13vs ETC:Doubles Vision:MacCollLost 01
L#1 DoublesMoira Donoghue / Louise Sterling vs Carol MacColl / Marie Roncalli6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2023-04-18vs LTC:HartryLost 01
L#1 DoublesMoira Donoghue / Noreen Little vs Valerie Stauber / Eugenie Micelotta3-6, 2-5
2023-04-01vs BOUS:BWAC Attack:AndrettaWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarie Sattler / Moira Donoghue vs Laurie Andretta / Linda Babich6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-03-27vs ETC:Mommy Agression 2.0:FoardLost 01
L#1 DoublesMoira Donoghue / Louise Sterling vs Elizabeth Kollias / Melinda Mason3-6, 2-6
2023-02-18vs LTC:Hot Shots:BeaudoinWon 10
W#1 DoublesNoreen Little / Moira Donoghue vs Barbara Beaudoin / Marianne Vinal6-0, 6-1
2023-02-18vs LTC:Queens of the Court:DesrochesLost 01
L#1 DoublesLouise Sterling / Marie Sattler vs Tamara Drummond / Sue Trompke4-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Moira Donoghue
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Marie Sattler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Louise Sterling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Noreen Little
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Moira Donoghue + Noreen Little4265% games+13.3% vs expected
Moira Donoghue + Louise Sterling12756% games+7.0% vs expected
Marie Sattler + Louise Sterling71144% games+0.2% vs expected
Marie Sattler + Moira Donoghue8750% games−2.7% vs expected
Marie Sattler + Noreen Little101844% games−4.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Moira Donoghue
68W–55L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
Marie Sattler
79W–98L career · 4 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Louise Sterling
127W–135L career · 4 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
Noreen Little
37W–58L career · 3 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.