Teams

Drummond

2026 CVTA Southern Combo 18 & Over - Winter '25 · Women 5.5

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-02-03vs WilliamsLost 12
L#1 DoublesRegina Drummond / Sandra Copeland vs Jean Sheffield / Nicole Williams6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRachel Ragland / Dana Strickland vs Ann Tatum / Amanda Swendsen5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAmy Harrington / Brooke Greenway vs Pamela Rutland / Marissa Gonzalez6-3, 6-3
2026-02-02vs MorganLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Brumbelow / Regina Drummond vs Ann Carroll / Lori Patch1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke Greenway / Kristie Teasley vs Lynde Pas / Pam Chapman5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDana Strickland / Tina Waggoner vs Camille Abney / Constance Fallin2-6, 3-6
2026-01-27vs MorganLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Brumbelow / Regina Drummond vs Pam Chapman / Cami Marcus3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Harrington / Brooke Greenway vs Lynde Pas / Lori Patch6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAmy Mitchell / Rebecca Silver vs Camille Abney / Ronna Sabino3-6, 3-6
2026-01-13vs WilliamsLost 03
L#1 DoublesTina Waggoner / Elizabeth Brumbelow vs Angela Evans / Sarah Wood0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Harrington / Brooke Greenway vs Kay Walraven Attaway / Breana Morris3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesClyde Spivey / Rebecca Silver vs Jean Sheffield / Nicole Williams6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2026-01-08vs MorganLost 03
L#1 DoublesTina Waggoner / Sandra Copeland vs Lynde Pas / Libby Lanier0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesClyde Spivey / Dana Strickland vs Vivian White / Lori Patch0-6, 0-2
L#3 DoublesRachel Ragland / Rebecca Silver vs Constance Fallin / Camille Abney3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-12-09vs WilliamsWon 21
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Brumbelow / Regina Drummond vs Jennifer Cunningham / Angela Evans2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesBrooke Greenway / Amy Harrington vs Kay Walraven Attaway / Ann Tatum7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRachel Ragland / Dana Strickland vs Marissa Gonzalez / Pamela Rutland6-4, 6-4
2025-12-02vs MorganLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Mitchell / Kristie Teasley vs Ann Carroll / Pam Abernathy4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesClyde Spivey / Sandra Copeland vs Millie Morgan / Pam Chapman1-6, 4-6
2025-11-18vs WilliamsWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmy Harrington / Elizabeth Brumbelow vs Breana Morris / Kay Walraven Attaway4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesRebecca Silver / Rachel Ragland vs Ann Tatum / Nicole Williams2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKristie Teasley / Amy Mitchell vs Jennifer Cunningham / Meredith Banta6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.39 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Kristie Teasley
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
Clyde Spivey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.57
Brooke Greenway
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.54
Regina Drummond
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Rebecca Silver
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.40
Rachel Ragland
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.35
Elizabeth Brumbelow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.15
Dana Strickland
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.07
Tina Waggoner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.07
Sandra Copeland
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Regina Drummond + Kristie Teasley1435% gamesnot enough data
Dana Strickland + Rachel Ragland134 matchesnot enough data
Regina Drummond + Elizabeth Brumbelow044 matchesnot enough data
Clyde Spivey + Elizabeth Brumbelow213 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Copeland + Tina Waggoner033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristie Teasley
17W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%5%95%
2.73
3
Clyde Spivey
10W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.64
3
Brooke Greenway
25W–37L career · 13 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
Regina Drummond
5W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
38%61%<1%
2.54
Rebecca Silver
5W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.42
Rachel Ragland
10W–31L career · 8 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
2.40
Elizabeth Brumbelow
6W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Dana Strickland
2W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15
Tina Waggoner
0W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Sandra Copeland
7W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.