Teams

CROWN

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - ASPEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-09vs HCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKelly Capri / Vivian Williams vs Megan Olson / Susan Cary3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJudi Simecek / Kathy Robinson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-25vs GSCC BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Kraft / Kathy Robinson vs Diane Boat / Keely Eberly6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCrystal McNamee / Kimberly Welsh vs Susan Blizzard / Jessica Junker6-0, 6-2
2023-09-18vs GSCC WHITEWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathy Robinson / Karen Kraft vs Ksana Oglesby / Jenell Hilderbrand6-1, 7-6
L#1 SinglesKimberly Welsh vs Siri Olsen2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAndrea Olson / Judi Simecek vs Martha Heim / Anne Sale6-2, 6-4
2023-09-11vs HCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJudi Simecek / Kathy Robinson vs Kristen Calarco / Susan Cary6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKimberly Welsh vs Kaia Moritz2-6, 4-6
2023-08-28vs BASALTLost 02
L#1 DoublesCrystal McNamee / Karen Kraft vs Ashley Richardson / Leslie Riddel4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesVivian Williams / Kelly Capri vs Adele Melnick / Karen Price3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-08-21vs GSCC SILVERLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrea Olson / Judi Simecek vs Amy Thornton / Jean Allard4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKimberly Welsh vs Erin Zalinski3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Glen / Vivian Williams vs Meghan Hegberg / Kate McRaith0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - ASPEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BASALT5113514108
2GSCC SILVER5113514129
3GSCC WHITE3310817128
4CROWN339919133

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Kathy Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Andrea Olson
published 3.5
3.18
Crystal McNamee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Karen Kraft
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Judi Simecek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.96
Kimberly Welsh
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Kelly Capri
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Julie Glen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Vivian Williams
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Crystal McNamee + Kathy Robinson3350% games+9.1% vs expected
Karen Kraft + Kathy Robinson4158% games+8.6% vs expected
Andrea Olson + Kathy Robinson2353% games+5.9% vs expected
Judi Simecek + Kathy Robinson202846% games+5.2% vs expected
Andrea Olson + Kelly Capri2442% games+0.6% vs expected
Crystal McNamee + Judi Simecek3352% games−0.2% vs expected
Judi Simecek + Kelly Capri31044% games−3.1% vs expected
Karen Kraft + Crystal McNamee3745% games−4.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathy Robinson
34W–46L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Andrea Olson
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Crystal McNamee
11W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
Karen Kraft
11W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Judi Simecek
50W–80L career · 4 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.10
Kimberly Welsh
21W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.96
3
Kelly Capri
31W–53L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
2.93
Julie Glen
16W–25L career · 1 line in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
Vivian Williams
11W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.