Teams

M.Cambo

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-01vs M.DougherLost 01
L#1 DoublesNina Bahto / Dyvonne Ellis vs Katherine Carver / Elizabeth Fogleman4-6, 1-6
2023-04-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMolly Lewis / Jolie LeBrun vs Carly High / Rachel Phelps1-6, 1-6
2023-04-17vs J.CollinsLost 01
L#1 DoublesDyvonne Ellis / Cindy Vu vs Kristine Potter / Darcy Louzao4-6, 1-6
2023-04-11vs B.ShaitLost 01
L#1 DoublesJolie LeBrun / Nina Bahto vs Jody Mahoney / Brianna Shait4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-04-03vs R.WatkinsLost 01
L#1 DoublesNina Bahto / Jolie LeBrun vs Reid Watkins / Erika Peterson5-7, 6-7
2023-03-20vs E.WallaceLost 01
L#1 SinglesJolie LeBrun vs Ellie Gilmore2-6, 2-6
2023-03-13vs A.Cantando 18Won 10
W#2 DoublesNina Bahto / Dyvonne Ellis vs Caroline Ives / Erica Oliver6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Molly Andrews
published
3.23
Madeline Cambo
published
3.05
Anh Vu
published 3
2.88
Cindy Vu
published 3
2.81
Jolie LeBrun
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.40
Lisa Pakela
published
2.22
Dyvonne Ellis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.88
Jenn Bollman
published
Ebony Baylis
published
Nina Bahto
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Pakela + Jenn Bollman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Molly Andrews
27W–23L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
Madeline Cambo
28W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%5%95%
3.23
3
Anh Vu
17W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Cindy Vu
4W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Jolie LeBrun
43W–49L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
Lisa Pakela
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%77%23%
2.40
2.5
Dyvonne Ellis
31W–86L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.22
Jenn Bollman
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.88
Ebony Baylis
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nina Bahto
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.