Teams

Davidson 7.5 55+

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 55 & over · Women 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-15vs MacCall/Murphy DayWon 30
W#1 DoublesStacey Anderson / Sarah McKenzie vs Jennifer Gick / Kathleen Murphy6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLori Haskins / Anna Martin vs Lois Randall / Susan Birle6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDonna Jaeckel / Linda Wilson vs Lynn Dallachie / Patricia Pelton6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Lori Haskins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Candy Garrett
published 4
3.74
Jeanne Gillen
published
3.45
Donna Jaeckel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Maureen Fehrs
published
3.29
Sarah McKenzie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Patti Kucan
published
Betty Mahoney
published 3.5
3.24
Melissa Huffman
published
3.22
Daphne Davidson
published 3.5
3.18
Michelle Sahlie
published
3.11
Dawn Heatwole
published 3.5
Linda Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah McKenzie + Patti Kucan4252% games+11.2% vs expected
Lori Haskins + Jeanne Gillen17456% games+0.5% vs expected
Michelle Sahlie + Maureen Fehrs3546% games−14.5% vs expected
Maureen Fehrs + Betty Mahoney3256% gamesnot enough data
Maureen Fehrs + Melissa Huffman404 matchesnot enough data
Donna Jaeckel + Daphne Davidson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Haskins
26W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.91
4
Candy Garrett
23W–18L career · no lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.74
Jeanne Gillen
25W–10L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.74
Donna Jaeckel
18W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
Maureen Fehrs
25W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
Sarah McKenzie
35W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Patti Kucan
44W–27L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Betty Mahoney
5W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Huffman
23W–10L career · no lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Daphne Davidson
9W–8L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Michelle Sahlie
10W–7L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Dawn Heatwole
7W–5L career · no lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
3.11
Linda Wilson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.