Teams

R.Wells

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-13vs K.KingLost 12
W#1 DoublesJerri Lemanski / Kathryn Poole vs Keeley McCormick / Kristen Duke6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMarlea Ward / Marlet Edwards vs Naomi Rodrigues / Karen Johnston2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCarter Grimes / Angela McGee vs Rebecca Edwards / Joanne Kearney2-6, 2-6
2023-05-07vs C.HaynesLost 02
L#1 DoublesJerri Lemanski / Kathryn Poole vs Merab Puleo / Sara Mazurak6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarter Grimes / Angela McGee vs Stephanie Black / Ann Hahn3-6, 2-6
2023-04-23vs K.LambSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKathryn Poole vs Jeannette Walker4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMarlet Edwards / Lawrie Givner vs Jessie Brinkley / Jo Ann Novak6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-16vs B.Robinson 3.0 18+Won 20
W#2 SinglesLawrie Givner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKathryn Poole / Carter Grimes vs Erika Plant / Brittany Robinson6-2, 6-4
2023-03-27vs M.GillWon 10
W#1 DoublesJerri Lemanski / Kathryn Poole vs Mary Allison Raper / Claudia Cadet6-3, 6-0
2023-03-26vs J.SolomonWon 20
W#1 DoublesJerri Lemanski / Kathryn Poole vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMarlea Ward / Carter Grimes vs Mindy Hamlin / Kathy Anderson6-1, 6-2
2023-03-19vs J.AndrewsLost 01
L#2 DoublesMarlea Ward / Lawrie Givner vs MA Allen / Jennifer Badham1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Lawrie Givner
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Kathryn Poole
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
2.76
Marlea Ward
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Angela McGee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.65
Carter Grimes
published 3
2.60
Marlet Edwards
published
Jerri Lemanski
published
Kerry Ruggieri
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carter Grimes + Kathryn Poole044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lawrie Givner
49W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Kathryn Poole
64W–78L career · 10 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.14
3
Marlea Ward
59W–68L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
2.76
2.5
Angela McGee
47W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%9%91%
2.69
3
Carter Grimes
5W–18L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
2.65
Marlet Edwards
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
Jerri Lemanski
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kerry Ruggieri
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Elizabeth Phillips
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.