Teams

UPTA18A/Benfield/SugarCreek

2025 UPTA Adult 18 & Over - USTA · 18+ Adult Women - 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-02vs UPTA18A/Zeimetz/PavilionSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLindsey New / Jodi Fortenberry vs Deb Dujardin / Dell Pulliam3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesErin McArthur vs Keeley Mezzancello5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMarissa Moore / Maria Batista vs Sandy Buol / Blair Zeimetz6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKerri Hughes / Judy Niver vs Bronwen Greene / Rebekah Fedrowitz3-3
2025-04-18vs UPTA18A/Knight/HollyTreeWon 31
W#1 DoublesErin McArthur / Jodi Fortenberry vs Claudia Kornaros / Lora Henderson6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesErin Benfield / Marissa Moore vs Ann Brodie / Lisa Littleton5-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLindsey New vs Corinne Nickell6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCristina Torres / Kim Barrs vs Gretchen Lawson / Kelly Johnson6-1, 6-3
L#1 DoublesLindsey New / Erin McArthur vs Brittany McKenzie / Haley Eidson1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesMarissa Moore vs Ashley Brown2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesErin Benfield / Kerri Hughes vs Jaime Stevens / Susan Tomforde5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMary Nunes / Judy Niver vs Jamie Dawson / Tiffany Boggs6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-02-21vs UPTA18A/Samuel-Posta/SouthsideWon 50
W#1 DoublesErin Benfield / Lindsey New vs Katy Davidson / Eunice Samuel6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesErin McArthur vs Cara Morris6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMary Nunes / Jodi Fortenberry vs Rachael Cariveau / Heather Warren6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMaria Batista vs Teresa Fox6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCristina Torres / Kim Barrs vs Tamra Daws / Traci Gmitro7-5, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Adult Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Maria Batista
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.89
Lindsey New
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.83
Marissa Moore
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Jodi Fortenberry
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
Mary Nunes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.62
Judy Niver
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Erin Benfield
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.48
Cristina Torres
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.27
Kim Barrs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Erin McArthur
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsey New + Erin Benfield4256% games+6.3% vs expected
Erin Benfield + Jodi Fortenberry6156% games+1.1% vs expected
Cristina Torres + Kim Barrs6742% games−5.6% vs expected
Lindsey New + Marissa Moore314 matchesnot enough data
Judy Niver + Mary Nunes303 matchesnot enough data
Judy Niver + Jodi Fortenberry213 matchesnot enough data
Judy Niver + Cristina Torres213 matchesnot enough data
Lindsey New + Erin McArthur213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Batista
39W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.02
Lindsey New
29W–8L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.89
Marissa Moore
14W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Jodi Fortenberry
15W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Mary Nunes
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Judy Niver
23W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Erin Benfield
24W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%24%76%
2.60
2.5
Cristina Torres
23W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
Kim Barrs
9W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Erin McArthur
12W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.