Teams

ATC SOLIS

2026 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Friday Ladies 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-17vs LTF TARKINGTONLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeanette Johnson / Michele Solis vs Carol Reinhart / Suzy Speight6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSandra Anderson / Donna Moses vs Michelle Hyland / Regena Tarkington6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesLisa Woody vs Angelina England1-6, 0-6
2026-04-10vs STC LOUKS/KISTLost 12
L#1 DoublesSandra Anderson / Donna Moses vs Ashley Burnett / Michelle Lonergan2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJeanette Johnson / Michele Solis vs Cara Kist / Jessica Marchetti6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesBrooke Blakeslee vs Abby Hyman1-6, 1-6
2026-03-27vs RTC HOLT/THOMPSONLost 03
L#1 SinglesBrooke Blakeslee vs Barbara Lindsay0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesLisa Woody vs Deborah Schlang4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJeanette Johnson / Julia Holden vs Lana Doggett / Kim Adamcik2-6, 6-7
2026-03-24vs RID EVANSWon 30
W#1 SinglesBrooke Blakeslee vs Molly Davidson1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSandra Anderson / Donna Moses vs Britni McDaniel / Hannah Boyd6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulia Holden / Georgie Zang vs Sydney Munson / Janie Stephanow7-5, 6-2
2026-03-13vs CCC ROSSLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichele Solis / Julia Holden vs Linda Paul / Mary Ellen Dickerson4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesBrooke Blakeslee vs Kelsey Blackledge2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Woody / Jeanette Johnson vs Jill Cassady / Sherri Ross6-4, 6-3
2026-03-06vs STC KULAKSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCristal Sherrill / Michele Solis vs Michelle Langley / Michelle Thomas7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSandra Anderson / Donna Moses vs Cecily Burk / Mary Dean6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJulia Holden vs Stephanie Abiodun6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Woody / Robin Collins vs Amber Whites / Suzanne Rogachuk3-6, 2-6
2026-02-27vs BIR BARTLETTLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeanette Johnson / Cristal Sherrill vs Tiffany Rogers / Melanie Bartlett6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJulia Holden vs Kimberly Knox1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLorein Campbell / Michele Solis vs Karen Taylor / Andrea Riddle7-5, 6-2
2026-02-20vs STC ZAVASKYLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichele Solis / Jeanette Johnson vs Judy Zavasky / Tiffany Larza6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGeorgie Zang / Julia Holden vs Alison Morris / Julie Schafer7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGinger Justice / Lisa Woody vs Janice Wolf / Janet Helsel7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Friday Ladies 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Donna Moses
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.49
Cristal Sherrill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Michele Solis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.21
Georgie Zang
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.18
Ginger Justice
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Julia Holden
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.10
Melissa Missy Brignac
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.10
Sandra Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.07
Lorein Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Brooke Blakeslee
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Lisa Woody
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.76
Cindie Spradlin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ginger Justice + Melissa Missy Brignac3842% games−6.9% vs expected
Michele Solis + Cristal Sherrill4261% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Anderson + Donna Moses314 matchesnot enough data
Julia Holden + Michele Solis123 matchesnot enough data
Michele Solis + Cindie Spradlin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Donna Moses
12W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Cristal Sherrill
17W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
Michele Solis
35W–33L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Georgie Zang
10W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Ginger Justice
14W–25L career · 8 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Julia Holden
8W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
Melissa Missy Brignac
8W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Sandra Anderson
17W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Lorein Campbell
18W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.07
3.5
Brooke Blakeslee
1W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.03
Lisa Woody
9W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Cindie Spradlin
10W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.