Teams

MLewis (Jeff Adams)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Women - Sat PM

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesKayla Carter / Sunny Bowers vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-30vs JAlexander/PBeecher (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKayla Carter / Elizabeth Schrand vs Jennifer Alexander / Janet Steyl6-3, 7-5
2022-04-09vs JAlexander/PBeecher (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#1 DoublesNatalie Osman / Sunny Bowers vs Paula Beecher / Carson Rose Tennyson6-3, 6-1
2022-04-02vs DWest (Park Road)Won 20
W#1 DoublesMagali Ballard / Stacy Agar vs Melissa Skovira / Karolina Fleming2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNatalie Osman / Elizabeth Schrand vs Jaclyn Rock / Salem Kirven6-3, 6-4
2022-03-05vs DWest (Park Road)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Uzarski / Elizabeth Schrand vs Salem Kirven / Samantha Danesis3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStacy Agar / Melanie Lewis vs Diana West / Diofra Azucenas6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-02-19vs JAlexander/PBeecher (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMagali Ballard / Elizabeth Schrand vs Carson Rose Tennyson / Callie Schmit6-1, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Women - Sat PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Sunny Bowers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.41
Elizabeth Schrand
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.39
4.35
Kelly Arzonico
published 4.5
4.26
Stacy Agar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.15
Melanie Lewis
published
4.08
Susan Uzarski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Allison Bumgardner
published 4.5
Lela Thompson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Uzarski + Kelly Arzonico13163% games+10.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sunny Bowers
50W–26L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Elizabeth Schrand
52W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY
46W–31L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
4.39
4.5
Kelly Arzonico
92W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
4.35
4.5
Stacy Agar
76W–49L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.26
Melanie Lewis
9W–2L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Susan Uzarski
127W–66L career · 1 line in 2022
27%73%<1%
4.08
4.5
Allison Bumgardner
25W–21L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
4.00
Lela Thompson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.