Teams

HCC - J. Price

2026 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Adult 18 & OverDay - Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-25vs HCC - D. AlbinaLost 23
W#1 DoublesDillon Yost / Janet Karpan vs Kelly Sincich / Olivia Rivas4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMariela Saban vs Irene Arias Gutierrez6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMelanie Clem / Sonya Sherrell vs Dagmar O'Rourke / Christina Dorothy1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesShannon Griffin vs Miriam Medina Cardena3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Gerlach / Christina Brugger vs Katie Healy / Dianne Albina6-7, 1-6
2026-02-28vs HILLS/AldeenLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Gerlach / Christina Brugger vs Kendall Shumake / Lilivette Arroyo2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMariela Saban vs Melissa King6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSonya Sherrell / Melanie Clem vs Marie Berghaus / Farheen Aldeen3-6, 4-6
2026-02-14vs HCC - D. AlbinaWon 32
L#1 DoublesDillon Yost / Samantha Romasiewicz vs Karen MacCormack / Christina Dorothy5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMariela Saban vs Jenelle Gallaway6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMelanie Clem / Sonya Sherrell vs Andrea Fajardo / Melissa Minniti5-5
L#2 SinglesLauren Reid vs Miriam Medina Cardena4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJanet Karpan / Elizabeth Gerlach vs Abby Kronk / Ashley Leary7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2026-02-07vs HILLS/AldeenLost 05
L#1 DoublesAnn Carlson / Mary Turnes vs Brittany Leuth / Nicole Perry1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMariela Saban vs McKenzie O'Brien4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChristina Brugger / Elizabeth Gerlach vs Angie Jones / Jamie Hamilton3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesShannon Griffin vs Maria Layrisse0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Karpan / Thuy Duong vs Farheen Aldeen / KAREN HARKEY2-6, 0-6
2026-01-31vs HCC - D. AlbinaLost 14
L#1 DoublesDillon Yost / Samantha Romasiewicz vs Dagmar O'Rourke / Karen MacCormack3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMariela Saban vs Irene Arias Gutierrez2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMelanie Clem / Janet Karpan vs Margaret Roset / Dianne Albina1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesThuy Duong vs Jenelle Gallaway2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChristina Brugger / Elizabeth Gerlach vs Ashley Leary / Elaine Aschenbrenner7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2026-01-17vs HILLS/AldeenLost 04
L#1 DoublesSamantha Romasiewicz / Dillon Yost vs Stephanie Means / McKenzie O'Brien3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesThuy Duong vs Katrina Duquemin1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChristina Brugger / Elizabeth Gerlach vs Elizabeth Rodgers / Lisa Ross3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJanet Karpan / Mary Turnes vs Andria Owen / Meredith Mueller3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 18 & OverDay - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Dillon Yost
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Christina Brugger
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.17
Mariela Saban
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.16
Sonya Sherrell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.11
Elizabeth Gerlach
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.05
Melanie Clem
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.04
Ann Carlson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Shannon Griffin
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.04
Samantha Romasiewicz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Janet Karpan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.87
Mary Turnes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Thuy Duong
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.58
Lauren Reid
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina Brugger + Elizabeth Gerlach4543% games−4.6% vs expected
Sonya Sherrell + Melanie Clem134 matchesnot enough data
Dillon Yost + Samantha Romasiewicz033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dillon Yost
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
Christina Brugger
145W–93L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.19
Mariela Saban
6W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.17
Sonya Sherrell
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Elizabeth Gerlach
184W–98L career · 6 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
4.11
Melanie Clem
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
4.05
4.5
Ann Carlson
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
37%63%<1%
4.04
Shannon Griffin
27W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
4.04
4.5
Samantha Romasiewicz
59W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
4.04
Janet Karpan
6W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
4.00
Mary Turnes
33W–62L career · 2 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
3.87
Thuy Duong
67W–51L career · 3 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.69
Lauren Reid
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.