Teams

RFC:SweatLikeAMother:Chappell

2021 ME Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.0 Women South

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-05vs RFC:NetResults:TraillWon 21
W#1 DoublesEliza Chappell / Kristie Green vs Lisa Kendrick / Mae Petra-Wong6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesElisabeth Hardcastle vs Diane Dow1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesCindy Rowland vs Lindsey Campbell6-3, 6-4
2021-06-05vs RFC:Topspinistas:TalbotLost 02
L#1 DoublesCindy Rowland / Elisabeth Hardcastle vs Krystal Talbot / Annie Houston4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKristie Green vs Kimberly Kelly-Brewster7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2021-05-23vs WOOD:Woodlanders:BryantLost 14
W#1 DoublesEliza Chappell / Kristie Green vs Karen Fendler / Deb Paszyc6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesCindy Rowland vs Joanna Pond1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNatalie Kent / Elisabeth Hardcastle vs Dawn Morong / Patricia Lefevre1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSarah Parisien vs Ruth Matt2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLela Williams / Amy Paquette vs Virgilia Bryant / Ann Miller1-6, 5-7
2021-05-23vs RFC:NetResults:TraillSplit 22
W#1 DoublesEliza Chappell / Cindy Rowland vs Amy Yu / Terry Burrows7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKristie Green vs Diane Dow6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesSarah Parisien vs Marilee Harris4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesElisabeth Hardcastle / Amy Paquette vs Lisa Kendrick / Marsha Traill1-6, 1-6
2021-05-08vs WOOD:Woodlanders:BryantLost 12
L#1 SinglesEliza Chappell vs Karen Fendler3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Rowland / Elisabeth Hardcastle vs Virgilia Bryant / Maureen Plain5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSarah Parisien vs Kimberly Oconnell4-6, 4-6
2021-05-01vs RFC:Topspinistas:TalbotLost 03
L#1 DoublesEliza Chappell / Cindy Rowland vs Krystal Talbot / Dana DeFilippo4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKristie Green vs Kimberly Kelly-Brewster5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesElisabeth Hardcastle / Kristalyn Keenan vs Elizabeth Langham / Lori Bianchi1-6, 4-6
2021-05-01vs WOOD:Woodlanders:BryantLost 12
L#1 DoublesTricia Thompson / Cindy Rowland vs Patricia Lefevre / Joanna Pond2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesEliza Chappell vs Deb Paszyc7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesSarah Parisien vs Kimberly Oconnell1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-04-10vs RFC:NetResults:TraillWon 21
W#1 DoublesTricia Thompson / Cindy Rowland vs Annette Welles / Wendy Jackson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEliza Chappell vs Diane Dow7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKristalyn Keenan / Lela Williams vs Lisa Kendrick / Lizzie Faure0-6, 2-6
2021-04-10vs RFC:Topspinistas:TalbotWon 20
W#1 DoublesEliza Chappell / Cindy Rowland vs Dana DeFilippo / Wendy Cannon1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSarah Parisien vs Krystal Talbot6-3, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women South have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Kristie Green
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
3.18
Cindy Rowland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.76
Sarah Parisien
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.70
Elisabeth Hardcastle
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.44
Lela Williams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Eliza Chappell
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eliza Chappell + Cindy Rowland4450% games+3.0% vs expected
Eliza Chappell + Kristie Green6944% games−3.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristie Green
120W–87L career · 11 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.85
3.5
Cindy Rowland
39W–26L career · 11 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
Sarah Parisien
38W–72L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Elisabeth Hardcastle
20W–21L career · type A · 6 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70
Lela Williams
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2021
68%32%<1%
2.44
Eliza Chappell
29W–40L career · 15 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.