Teams

Pedro/Memphis

2026 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 3.0 Men 18 & over

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-06vs Hankins/MemphisLost 02
L#2 DoublesMichael Mohler / Junwang Xu vs Bryce Daves / Sean Henneberger2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAlan Moore / Ryan Aghabeg vs Blake Hankins / Ryan McDurmon3-6, 2-6
2026-05-03vs Raymond/MemphisSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSteven Ling / Michael Mohler vs Zach Bush / Eric Raymond0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRyan Aghabeg / Alan Moore vs Kyle Gan / Paul Fultz6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesMichael Agyemang vs Kyle Wood6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesEdward Friedman / Jared Roaten vs Jose Romero / Phillip Kirlin2-6, 4-6
2026-04-19vs Collins/MemphisWon 21
W#2 DoublesHuan Nguyen / Michael Mohler vs John William Ables / Colt Von Lanken6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMichael Agyemang vs Jacob Monteverde2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAlan Moore / Jared Roaten vs Drew Hursey / Daniel Wynn6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-08vs Moore/MemphisSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJunwang Xu / Jared Roaten vs Ricky Lipford / Keith Gibson3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMichael Agyemang / Ryan Aghabeg vs Devarius Minor / Christian Craine6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Ryan Aghabeg
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Michael Mohler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Junwang Xu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Michael Agyemang
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.74
Alan Moore
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Edward Friedman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Jared Roaten
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.43
Michael Wittke
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Wittke + Alan Moore4344% games−19.5% vs expected
Edward Friedman + Jared Roaten0530% gamesnot enough data
Michael Mohler + Jared Roaten3244% gamesnot enough data
Michael Mohler + Alan Moore224 matchesnot enough data
Michael Wittke + Michael Mohler123 matchesnot enough data
Michael Mohler + Ryan Aghabeg123 matchesnot enough data
Ryan Aghabeg + Alan Moore123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Aghabeg
14W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
2.85
Michael Mohler
11W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Junwang Xu
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
Michael Agyemang
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Alan Moore
14W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Edward Friedman
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Jared Roaten
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Michael Wittke
5W–14L career · no lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.