Teams

LJBE-Belnick/Westport 18s 6.5

2026 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 6.5 Men Sat 18s

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 5 9:00 AM
vs N/A
Jason BelnickStephen Phillips
Sep 12 9:00 AM
The Club at Westport
Sep 19 9:00 AM
The Club at Westport
Sep 26 9:00 AM
The Club at Westport
Oct 3 9:00 AM
The Club at Westport
Oct 10 9:00 AM
vs N/A
Jason BelnickStephen Phillips
Oct 17 9:00 AM
Bailey Road Park Tennis Court Complex
2026-08-29vs LJFE - Fernandez/EdgeLost 12
L#1 DoublesKurt Lueck / Josh Henley vs Jeffrey McCue / Richard Fogel7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPeter Norelli / Mark Dlugosz vs Andrew Howland / Sridhar Tharumadurai1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLanre Olubori / Edward Fiore vs Gaurav Kapoor / WOUTER van LOO7-5, 7-6
2026-08-22vs LBKI-King/JettonLost 03
L#1 DoublesLanre Olubori / Edward Fiore vs Tom Waber / John Lesher7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEdward Levy / Josh Henley vs Richard Dandurand / William Barnes2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKevin Lee / Paul Reid vs Tom Craft / Dean Miller1-6, 4-6
2026-08-15vs LJLA-Lands/NMPLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephen Phillips / Josh Henley vs Rip Robbins / Bradford Powell1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEdward Levy / Paul Reid vs Cole Wilson / Chuck Geer5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJason Belnick / Andy Powers vs Robert Ageenko / Brody Smith0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 6.5 Men Sat 18s
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LJFE - Fernandez/Edge1021326
2LAFE-FEINBERG/BAILEY000000
3LBKI-King/Jetton0112430
4LJBE-Belnick/Westport 18s 6.50103638

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Kurt Lueck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Lanre Olubori
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Jason Belnick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Edward Levy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.77
Edward Fiore
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.76
Andy Powers
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Josh Henley
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.72
Paul Reid
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Peter Norelli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kurt Lueck
36W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Lanre Olubori
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
Jason Belnick
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Edward Levy
138W–135L career · 2 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.02
Edward Fiore
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Andy Powers
13W–6L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Josh Henley
44W–38L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Paul Reid
16W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Peter Norelli
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.