Teams

Amy Brown-YTC-18+-4.0

2024 Auburn USTA Mixed Doubles 18 & Over July Tournament · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-14vs Holmes-YTc-18+-4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesDerek Cotton / Natacha Phillips vs Olivier Dury / Elizabeth Cobb6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-07-14vs Holmes-YTc-18+-4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesSean McKeague / Ashley Edmonds vs Natali Wiedemann / Caleb Taylor5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-07-13vs Holmes-YTc-18+-4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesSean McKeague / Piper Vance vs Leslie Calloway / Olivier Dury6-2, 6-1
2024-07-13vs Holmes-YTc-18+-4.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesPiper Vance / Sean McKeague vs DANITA ALLEN / Thadeus Cacanindin7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesNatacha Phillips / Dustin Woodham vs April Wittmann / Graham Richey5-7, 3-6
2024-07-12vs Holmes-YTc-18+-4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesDerek Cotton / Natacha Phillips vs DANITA ALLEN / Thadeus Cacanindin6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Brad Brown
published 4
3.88
Derek Cotton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Brandon Bachman
published 4
3.74
Jenni Payne
published
3.68
Natacha Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Sean McKeague
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Ashley Edmonds
published 4
Dustin Woodham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Derek Cotton + Natacha Phillips7162% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Edmonds + Brandon Bachman404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brad Brown
10W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Derek Cotton
27W–15L career · type S · 2 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Brandon Bachman
20W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.84
Jenni Payne
39W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.74
Natacha Phillips
134W–77L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Sean McKeague
71W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Ashley Edmonds
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
3.47
Dustin Woodham
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.