Teams

Mejia

Combo · 5.5 Ladies

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-27vs ShewmakeLost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Shaw / Sara Parrott vs Melanie Shephard / Robin Perrin4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-08-20vs ToddLost 02
L#1 DoublesShannon Hansen / Sara Parrott vs Lingxi Xu / Shannon Yarbrough2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJacky Nghiem / Bethany Nix vs Katlyn Longley / Teresa Popp4-6, 2-6
2026-08-17vs Ballou/McNeilWon 10
W#3 DoublesChamonix Mejia / Sandra Thoms vs Katie Kamper / Amy Wimmers7-5, 6-4
2026-08-06vs PearsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesJacky Nghiem / Katharine Newberry vs Lisa McIntire / Darima Fotheringham1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSara Fierro / Jill Simpson vs Kathy Eubanks / Baiarma Soktoeva2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesShannon Hansen / Anna Purdue vs Jayme Pearson / Kristina Edwards2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 5.5 Ladies
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ballou/McNeil2163663
2Shewmake1142549
3Mejia1133764
4Salazar031816105

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Jacky Nghiem
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Sara Parrott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Chamonix Mejia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Anna Purdue
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Katie Crump
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Jill Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Bethany Nix
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.16
Katharine Newberry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.03
Sara Fierro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.00
Shannon Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Parrott + Jill Simpson0527% gamesnot enough data
Chamonix Mejia + Sara Parrott123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jacky Nghiem
10W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Sara Parrott
7W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Chamonix Mejia
9W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Anna Purdue
9W–7L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.89
Katie Crump
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Jill Simpson
2W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%2%
2.73
2.5
Bethany Nix
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Katharine Newberry
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
Sara Fierro
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Shannon Hansen
0W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.