Teams

Reasner 55+ 3.5 Spring

2023 USTA League Adult 55 & Over - Spring - HSV · 3.5 Men 55N3D

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-04-30vs Larsen 3.5 55+ SpringLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael French / Thomas Hargrove vs PETER DEROCHEMONT / Michael Perry1-6, 3-6
2023-04-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesThomas Hargrove / Michael French vs Bill Allen / David Kallansrude6-0, 6-1
2023-04-11vs vanvalkenburghWon 10
W#1 DoublesThomas Hargrove / Boyd Berryhill vs Parker Altice / Keith Anderson5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-04-04vs Reaves 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichael French / Thomas Hargrove vs Billy Driver / Steve Rowley6-2, 7-5
2023-04-01vs PerryLost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas Hargrove / Chuck Lamar vs Andrew Devine / Jeff Tate3-6, 4-6
2023-03-29vs Larsen 3.5 55+ SpringWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael French / Thomas Hargrove vs William Lawson / Richard Salling6-3, 6-1
2023-03-24vs Mann 55+ SpringWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael French / Thomas Hargrove vs Paul Mann / Michael Dugan6-3, 6-0
2023-03-14vs HU - KingLost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas Hargrove / Dennis Reasner vs Tim Bishop / David Simmons6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-03-09vs vanvalkenburghWon 10
W#1 DoublesThomas Hargrove / Dennis Reasner vs Dennis Difranco / Darden Heritage6-2, 6-0
2023-02-27vs Reaves 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTom Moss / Thomas Hargrove vs Ricky Llewellyn / Paul Williams6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men 55N3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Boyd Berryhill
published 3.5
3.19
Ben Donahue
published 3.5
3.15
Thomas Hargrove
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Keith Sexton
published
3.12
Dennis Reasner
published 3.5
3.10
Chuck Lamar
published 3.5
2.97
Tom Moss
published
Mickey Tidmore
published
Richard Allison
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ben Donahue + Keith Sexton3344% games−4.5% vs expected
Dennis Reasner + Keith Sexton2349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Boyd Berryhill
34W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Ben Donahue
16W–18L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Thomas Hargrove
88W–115L career · 10 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
Keith Sexton
22W–30L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Dennis Reasner
26W–48L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Chuck Lamar
34W–75L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
Tom Moss
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.97
Mickey Tidmore
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Allison
0W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.