Teams

Carnahan Fall

2022 Adult 55 & OVER EARLY START · 7.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-11-11vs NAISTATLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Streater / Mark Sulzbach vs Rick Hancks / George Kimball6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2021-11-04vs Ledray- No FaultsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Streater / Mark Sulzbach vs Michael Trangle / Eric Black6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2021-10-07vs NAISTATWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Streater / Mark Sulzbach vs Richard Naistat / Scott Carlson6-2, 6-1
2021-09-30vs NAISTATWon 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Bennett / Michael Streater vs Richard Naistat / Jeffrey Kline6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Bradley Springer
published 4
3.72
Daniel Crouser
published 4
3.64
Rich Kusick
published
3.55
Eric Dieperink
published 3.5
3.43
Michael Streater
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.31
Mark Sulzbach
published
3.28
Paul Bennett
published
3.27
Ken Theisen
published
3.24
Michael Tennis
published
3.23
Chuck Tatsuda
published 3.5
3.21
John Carnahan
published
3.15
Frank Jossi
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ken Theisen + Paul Bennett9156% games+2.5% vs expected
Michael Tennis + Eric Dieperink5350% games−3.1% vs expected
John Carnahan + Frank Jossi213 matchesnot enough data
John Carnahan + Chuck Tatsuda213 matchesnot enough data
Michael Tennis + Chuck Tatsuda213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bradley Springer
9W–13L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Daniel Crouser
21W–28L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Rich Kusick
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Eric Dieperink
22W–18L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.55
Michael Streater
158W–102L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
Mark Sulzbach
3W–14L career · no lines in 2022
92%8%<1%
3.31
Paul Bennett
133W–88L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
Ken Theisen
50W–33L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Michael Tennis
27W–26L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Chuck Tatsuda
18W–35L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
John Carnahan
17W–18L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Frank Jossi
13W–18L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.