Teams

BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AM4.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.5

23 players · average NTRP 4.56 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Shiraz Madan
published
4.42
Benjamin Butin
published 4.5
4.41
Yi Ding
published
4.40
Anastas Budagov
published 4.5
4.34
Aneil Kamboj
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.33
Harshit Mehta
published
4.31
Alex Stolyar
published 4.5
4.31
Paul Liu
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.30
Carlos Basto
published 4.5
4.29
Brian Heimbecker
usually #1 Doubles 27%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 5
4.29
Abhishek Nishis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.28
Christopher Abate
published 4.5
4.27
Minal Mishra
published
Aditya Sanghani
published 4.5
4.24
Kevin Margo
published
4.11
Ruhan Prasad
published
4.11
Max Bunag
published
4.07
Nghien Nguyen
published
4.01
Tom Kent
published
4.00
Eugene Trilesnik
published
3.99
Vijay Sundaresan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Rainer Leeb
published
Greg Lawler
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shiraz Madan
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
Benjamin Butin
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
4.42
Yi Ding
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
4.41
4.5
Anastas Budagov
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
4.40
4.5
Aneil Kamboj
11W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
4.34
Harshit Mehta
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
4.33
4.5
Alex Stolyar
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
Paul Liu
28W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Carlos Basto
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.30
5
Brian Heimbecker
367W–83L career · 10 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.29
4.5
Abhishek Nishis
13W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Christopher Abate
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
Minal Mishra
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Aditya Sanghani
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Margo
19W–19L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.24
Ruhan Prasad
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.11
Max Bunag
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.11
Nghien Nguyen
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
4.07
Tom Kent
5W–14L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
4.01
Eugene Trilesnik
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
4.00
Vijay Sundaresan
16W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.99
Rainer Leeb
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
3.89
Greg Lawler
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.