Teams

Nelson OneSummer (Daytime only)

2021 One Doubles · 4.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-08-15vs #motherdaughter (Flexible)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRacquel Johnson / Cindy Nelson vs Nancy Rutter / Caroline Hamilton3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-07-27vs Czeisler Dunkin (Flexible)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRacquel Johnson / Cindy Nelson vs Jennifer Czeisler / Leigh Anne Dunkin4-6, 5-7
2021-07-18vs Borsan (Flexible)Won 10
W#1 DoublesCindy Nelson / Wendy Mounger vs Cristina Borsan / Emily Pelosi6-3, 6-1
2021-07-11vs Lucky shot (Daytime only)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRacquel Johnson / Cindy Nelson vs Sabina Hilmar / Sharon Saw6-4, 6-4
2021-07-09vs Happy Family (Flexible)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCindy Nelson / Brenda Williams vs Tessie Decker / Amy Holmes4-6, 4-6
2021-07-05vs Team J (Flexible)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCindy Nelson / Wendy Mounger vs Sachiko Ishihara-Spray / Keiko Lambuth3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-06-17vs Yellow&Fuzzy (Flexible)Won 10
W#1 DoublesCindy Nelson / Brenda Williams vs Lauren Joung / Kate Wang6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings22 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team J (Flexible)7070344
2BETC-The Mojo and Lady Nguyen (Flexible)6060345
3#motherdaughter (Flexible)6161561
4SBV5151342
5Service With a Smile (Flexible)5151545
6Corsano4242442
7High Strung Hitters (Flexible)4242544
8Happy Family (Flexible)4343872
9Hood (Flexible)3333650
10McRoberts/Morrow (Daytime only)3333652
11Kick'n Pair3333754
12Borsan (Flexible)3434873
13Nelson OneSummer (Daytime only)3434966
14Yellow&Fuzzy (Flexible)3434966
15Hit The Damn Ball!2424850
16Party-at-Net (Flexible)2424854
17Team Ziggy (Flexible)2424965
18Czeisler Dunkin (Flexible)25251072
19R&R Rock and Roll15151064
20Firestone15151067
21Summer Sets (Daytime only)15151068
22Lucky shot (Daytime only)07071483

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Cindy Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Wendy Mounger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.86
Racquel Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Nelson + Racquel Johnson3840% games−8.3% vs expected
Wendy Mounger + Cindy Nelson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cindy Nelson
55W–82L career · 7 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Wendy Mounger
29W–22L career · 2 lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
4.14
4
Racquel Johnson
112W–84L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
3.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.