Teams

SOrlick/RRossi (Blakeney)

2022 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men - Tues PM

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-04vs TFarley (Park Crossing)Won 10
W#1 DoublesGanesh Pallem / Benjamin Bergeson vs Keith Lowe / John Cantrell6-0, 6-4
2022-09-20vs JDichak (Weddington)Won 10
W#1 DoublesGanesh Pallem / Benjamin Bergeson vs Ron Dock / Mike Gentile6-0, 6-0
2022-09-13vs JConklin (Carmel)Won 10
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Bergeson / Ganesh Pallem vs Ali Elaasar / Tom Parker6-1, 6-3
2022-09-08vs ABecker (JCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesGanesh Pallem / Michael van Bergen vs RONALD TOWNSEND / Michael Stier7-5, 6-1
2022-09-06vs JButurff (Life Time)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDouglas Harrison / Michael van Bergen vs Jeff Buturff / Kevin Warren1-6, 4-6
2022-08-23vs RPietrykowski (PPRSC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Bergeson / Ganesh Pallem vs Tim Hausmann / Nathan Dunn6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-08-16vs TFarley (Park Crossing)Split 11
W#1 DoublesGanesh Pallem / Benjamin Bergeson vs John Moritz / Kevin Boyle6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNicholas Kizoulis / Michael van Bergen vs Rick Haskell / Juan Sintes6-7, 6-7
2022-08-09vs MFresina (Raintree)Won 10
W#3 DoublesGanesh Pallem / Steven Orlick vs Michael Fresina / Kevin Dixon6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Robert Shore
published
3.47
Ganesh Pallem
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.36
Michael van Bergen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Patricio Aycinena
published
3.20
Benjamin Bergeson
published 3.5
3.14
Kevin Fox
published
2.78
Douglas Harrison
published 3
2.57
Steven Orlick
published
2.55
Ron Rossi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael van Bergen + Ganesh Pallem10361% games+6.2% vs expected
Douglas Harrison + Ron Rossi044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Shore
30W–22L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Ganesh Pallem
129W–71L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Michael van Bergen
89W–80L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
Patricio Aycinena
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Benjamin Bergeson
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Kevin Fox
11W–17L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
3
Douglas Harrison
9W–24L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.78
Steven Orlick
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
2.57
Ron Rossi
6W–18L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.