Teams

Thongphok

2022 Frederick Adult 18 & Over · Frederick Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.08 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-06-09vs Dickerson +Won 10
W#2 DoublesSandy Thongphok / Nikki Eyman vs Faye Meyers / Anamaria Davalos6-0, 6-3
2022-06-06Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNikki Eyman / Miki Reed vs Beth Young / Laura Jones4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-06-02vs Sullivan/DeAgostino 18+Lost 02
L#2 DoublesNikki Eyman / Miki Reed vs Monica DeAgostino / Lori Grimaldi5-7, 4-5
L#3 DoublesShaunte Taswell / Kaila Gerald vs Melanie Mulligan / Christine Hawk2-6, 5-7
2022-05-31vs Dickerson +Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNikki Eyman / Miki Reed vs Kimberly LaRose / HELLEN IBARRA5-7, 4-6
2022-05-26vs DeGioia 3.0 18+Lost 02
L#2 DoublesMaria Quicksell / Susan Lea vs Christie Gray / Michelle Reno5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesShelby Price / Shaunte Taswell vs STACEY WOLFE / Traci Bidinger2-6, 4-6
2022-05-24vs Sullivan/DeAgostino 18+Won 10
W#2 DoublesNikki Eyman / Miki Reed vs Monica DeAgostino / Kristen Hostler6-3, 6-4
2022-05-18Won 10
W#3 DoublesShaunte Taswell / Miki Reed vs STACEY WOLFE / Stacey Donaldson5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSandy Thongphok / Shaunte Taswell vs HELLEN IBARRA / Abbey Fecher2-6, 2-6
2022-05-11Lost 01
L#2 DoublesShaunte Taswell / Shelby Price vs Trisha Kinman / Christine Hawk3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-05-04Lost 01
L#2 DoublesShaunte Taswell / Shelby Price vs Robin Dickerson / April Wick3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Sandy Thongphok
published 3.5
3.17
Nikki Eyman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Joanna Woessner
published
3.00
Miki Reed
published
2.91
Angela Sharma
published 3
2.88
Carrie Derse
published 3
2.68
Maria Quicksell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.46
Shaunte Taswell
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shaunte Taswell + Maria Quicksell3252% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sandy Thongphok
277W–124L career · no lines in 2022
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Nikki Eyman
233W–188L career · 5 lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.17
Joanna Woessner
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%22%78%
3.10
Miki Reed
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Angela Sharma
57W–78L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Carrie Derse
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Maria Quicksell
54W–38L career · 1 line in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
2.5
Shaunte Taswell
78W–105L career · 15 lines in 2022
0%63%37%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.