Teams

KY/LEX/Smith

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER LEXINGTON · 3.5 Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-01vs KY/LEX/RossWon 10
W#2 DoublesDerrick Smith / Randall Owens vs Gheorghe Ignat / Gregory Miller7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-20vs KY/LEX/RondonLost 01
L#1 DoublesRandall Owens / Derrick Smith vs Joey Mckinney / Ravi Raithatha1-6, 1-6
2026-02-11vs KY/LEX/Cunningham/RuddWon 41
W#1 DoublesEvan Brown / Jacob Senters vs Anthony Strode / Guston Thomas6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJon Terry vs Patrick Milburn6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJason Hawley / Randall Owens vs Mark Miller / Scot Simonsen6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesCaeden Bartley vs Doug Campbell4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPatrick Hancock / Mark Vinas vs Kevin Downs / Craig Lutzke6-4, 6-4
2026-01-11vs KY/LEX/Cunningham/RuddWon 32
L#1 DoublesTodd Gorrell / Ryan McQuerry vs Anthony Strode / Guston Thomas2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJon Terry vs Doug Campbell6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMiguel Prieto-Valle / Derrick Smith vs Craig Lutzke / Mark Miller6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesCaeden Bartley vs Kevin Downs1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPatrick Hancock / Stephen Owens vs Stephen Gray / Johan Graham6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Randall Owens
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.49
Miguel Prieto-Valle
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.47
Jon Terry
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.45
Brandon Shetler
published 3.5
3.43
Stephen Owens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Jason Hawley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Jacob Senters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Martin Summers
published
3.37
Ryan McQuerry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Patrick Hancock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Derrick Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Caeden Bartley
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Evan Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Mark Vinas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Morgan Cordray
published
Todd Gorrell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan McQuerry + Stephen Owens404 matchesnot enough data
Jon Terry + Evan Brown314 matchesnot enough data
Randall Owens + Derrick Smith303 matchesnot enough data
Patrick Hancock + Stephen Owens123 matchesnot enough data
Patrick Hancock + Jon Terry123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Randall Owens
24W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
Miguel Prieto-Valle
9W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
Jon Terry
28W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.47
3.5
Brandon Shetler
6W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Stephen Owens
16W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
Jason Hawley
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Jacob Senters
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Martin Summers
8W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
Ryan McQuerry
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Patrick Hancock
18W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Derrick Smith
10W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Caeden Bartley
2W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Evan Brown
15W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Mark Vinas
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
Morgan Cordray
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Todd Gorrell
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.