Teams

6 Avalon Ghita

2024 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weeknight · Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.58 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-10vs 2 Westwood LeftwichLost 02
L#1 DoublesAndrew Zima / Lyman Brown vs John Martin / William Pilc4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesYan Wu / Richard Bland vs John Baker / James Mullahy3-6, 3-6
2024-09-03vs 1 MAC SnowWon 10
W#2 DoublesLaurent Beausergent / Gabriel Ghita vs Erich Yost / Kevin Cousins6-3, 6-1
2024-08-27vs 3 MAC Captain Morgans StandLost 01
L#1 DoublesLyman Brown / Andrew Zima vs Charles Samson / Jonathan McDorman5-7, 5-7
L#1 DoublesRyan Politowicz / Lyman Brown vs Colin Blair / Richard Lloyd4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGabriel Ghita / Richard Bland vs Craig Leahy / Joseph Andy Gilbert4-6, 4-6
2024-08-13vs 5 Hermitage BlankleyLost 01
L#1 DoublesLyman Brown / Andrew Zima vs Mac Stuckey / Todd Furbee2-6, 2-6
2024-08-06vs 4 Three Chopt Young's Mean MAchineLost 01
L#1 DoublesRyan Politowicz / Lyman Brown vs Everett Hettema / Tim Parks2-6, 2-6
2024-08-01vs 13 Kanawha Ace Holes - WalekLost 01
L#1 DoublesLyman Brown / Ian Shupack vs Ward Hackett / James Michau5-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Andrew Zima
published 4
3.72
Ryan Politowicz
published
3.61
Jeremy Kokemor
published
3.50
Lyman Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Andrew Armstrong
published 3.5
3.40
Ian Shupack
published
3.37
Gabriel Ghita
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Richard Bland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Todd Milligan
published
3.16
Vikram Nagulan
published
3.09
2.67
Istvan Godri Martis
published
Laurent Beausergent
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Todd Milligan + Jeremy Kokemor4263% games+11.9% vs expected
Gabriel Ghita + Richard Bland1442% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Zima
23W–20L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Ryan Politowicz
16W–13L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Jeremy Kokemor
22W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.61
4
Lyman Brown
182W–202L career · 6 lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Andrew Armstrong
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
Ian Shupack
14W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Gabriel Ghita
136W–77L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Richard Bland
251W–138L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Todd Milligan
18W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Vikram Nagulan
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
3
Darioush Ramazani
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.09
Istvan Godri Martis
5W–14L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
Laurent Beausergent
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.