Teams

OB-Wood

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring Night League - GS · 3.5 Adult Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-10vs GS-KunkelSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMolly Wagner / Roxanne Bates vs Leanne Collins / Heather Sefton-Sterling6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesFarrah Keel / Jamie Wood vs Connie Chenoweth Butts / Brandy Lewis3-6, 6-7
2025-03-08vs GS-KunkelLost 13
L#1 DoublesFarrah Keel / Tatum Keel vs Heather Sefton-Sterling / Leanne Collins7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCyndi Patterson vs Terri Ammons2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMolly Wagner / Roxanne Bates vs Jill Kunkel / Ellen Lee6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSuzette Taylor / Jamie Wood vs Marcy Costa / Jessica Lazzarino2-6, 6-7
2025-02-24vs GS-KunkelLost 13
L#1 DoublesMary Bradley / Molly Wagner vs Susan Carroll / Jill Kunkel2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesErin Risco vs Brandy Lewis6-0, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJamie Wood / Jennifer Peterson vs Ashley Wheeler / Terri Ammons1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKim Humphrey / Roxanne Bates vs Jessica Lazzarino / Marcy Costa6-4, 6-4
2025-02-17vs GS-KunkelLost 03
L#1 DoublesCyndi Patterson / Farrah Keel vs Ellen Lee / Susan Carroll2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMolly Wagner / Mary Bradley vs Terri Ammons / Jessica Lazzarino2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJamie Wood / Kim Humphrey vs Brandy Lewis / Connie Chenoweth Butts1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Mary Bradley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Michelle Fountain
published
3.09
Roxanne Bates
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Molly Wagner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Farrah Keel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Kim Humphrey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Jamie Wood
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Cyndi Patterson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.71
Tatum Keel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Erin Risco
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Bradley + Molly Wagner044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Bradley
31W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Michelle Fountain
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Roxanne Bates
11W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Molly Wagner
21W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Farrah Keel
5W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Kim Humphrey
8W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Jamie Wood
15W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3.5
Cyndi Patterson
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
2.84
Tatum Keel
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Erin Risco
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.