Teams

Canterbury NR

2025 Tuscaloosa USTA Tri-Level Weeknight 18&over · Women 2.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-19vs TTC Cash Tri-LevelWon 30
W#1 DoublesInes de Urtubey / Marina Williams vs Deborah Swanquist / Katherine Garayanala6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlison Phillips / Melissa Wommack vs Lakin Smith / Lynn Zimmer3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Canterbury / Addie Akins vs Riley ORear / Tricia Murphy6-2, 6-0
2025-07-17vs TTC Cash Tri-LevelLost 12
L#1 DoublesAllison Espey / Ines de Urtubey vs Deborah Swanquist / Ashlyn Cash2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPasquale Tosyali / Alison Phillips vs Lakin Smith / Pamela Welbourne4-2
L#3 DoublesLinda Canterbury / Addie Akins vs Beth Thomas / Tricia Murphy6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2025-07-07vs TTC Kirkland Trilevel 2.5/3.0/3.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesCarrie Fitts / Jill Rowley vs Cynthia Walker / Erin Moore6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPasquale Tosyali / Alison Phillips vs Amanda Arnold / Tara Ketchum2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLinda Canterbury / Lindsey White vs Claire Golding / Katie Clary6-7, 4-6
2025-06-03vs TTC Kirkland Trilevel 2.5/3.0/3.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLynn Shaw / Jill Rowley vs DeDe Clary / Tara Ketchum2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlison Phillips / Kacie Spruill vs Debra Burroughs / Allison Anderson1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Canterbury / Addie Akins vs Wendy Rawlings / Katie Clary6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Allison Espey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Carrie Fitts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Ines de Urtubey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Lynn Shaw
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Marina Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Melissa Wommack
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Jill Rowley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Addie Akins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.43
Alison Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.43
Linda Canterbury
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
Pasquale Tosyali
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.94
Lindsey White
published
Kacie Spruill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Addie Akins + Linda Canterbury213 matchesnot enough data
Alison Phillips + Pasquale Tosyali213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allison Espey
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Carrie Fitts
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.92
Ines de Urtubey
27W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Lynn Shaw
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.87
Marina Williams
30W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%12%
2.83
Melissa Wommack
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Jill Rowley
32W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%37%63%
2.55
3
Addie Akins
10W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
3
Alison Phillips
18W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.43
Linda Canterbury
18W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%70%30%
2.43
Pasquale Tosyali
19W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.41
Lindsey White
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Kacie Spruill
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.