Teams

PUR/KY/JONES

2022 USTA TRI-LEVEL 18 & OVER PURCHASE · 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Blair Brockman
published 4
3.73
Tammy Cook
published
3.39
Donnitta Pyle
published 4
3.39
Heidi van Ameringen
published 3.5
3.36
Christina Rikel
published 3.5
3.31
Marta Elliott
published
3.14
KerriBeth Sutla
published
3.13
Donna Almand
published 3.5
3.11
Chelsea Hartmann
published 3.5
KIM WILSON
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marta Elliott + Chelsea Hartmann4251% games+10.0% vs expected
Tammy Cook + Donnitta Pyle4157% games+4.6% vs expected
Donnitta Pyle + Christina Rikel1937% games−9.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Blair Brockman
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tammy Cook
14W–6L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Donnitta Pyle
26W–32L career · no lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
3.39
3.5
Heidi van Ameringen
41W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Christina Rikel
21W–35L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Marta Elliott
18W–18L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
KerriBeth Sutla
3W–11L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Donna Almand
35W–38L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Chelsea Hartmann
23W–24L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
KIM WILSON
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.