Teams

RIO DEL ORO S70M7.0A

2025 ADULT 70&Over · Men 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-28vs SOLANO TA/ALLAN WITT PK S70M7.0ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesKejing Song / Rick Wagner vs James Tatka / Michael Garcia6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPeter Spaulding / Randy Willardsen vs Raymond Gibson / Don Hirsohn6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-09-10vs SOLANO TA/ALLAN WITT PK S70M7.0ALost 12
L#1 DoublesKejing Song / Rick Wagner vs Randy Gularte / Don Hirsohn4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPaul Taylor / Elton Roscorla vs Hugh Hinds / Raymond Gibson6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPeter Spaulding / Randy Willardsen vs Michael Lee / John Henshaw2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-29vs SOLANO TA/ALLAN WITT PK S70M7.0AWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Dozier / Elton Roscorla vs Don Hirsohn / Raymond Gibson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPhillip Allman / Chris Iwata vs Michael Lee / John Henshaw4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKejing Song / Rick Wagner vs Russ Dugoni / Michael Garcia6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Michael Dozier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Chris Iwata
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Kejing Song
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Randy Willardsen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Patrick Carter
published
Elton Roscorla
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Paul Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Spaulding
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Phillip Allman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rick Wagner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Thomas Schauer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Taylor + Elton Roscorla213 matchesnot enough data
Kejing Song + Rick Wagner213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Dozier
34W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
3.5
Chris Iwata
18W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Kejing Song
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Randy Willardsen
17W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
Patrick Carter
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
Elton Roscorla
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Taylor
11W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Peter Spaulding
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Phillip Allman
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rick Wagner
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Schauer
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.