Teams

Wilson - RS Hard

2025 Escambia Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-11-20vs Escambia/SparksLost 12
L#1 DoublesLauren Burch / Ashley Butler vs Amatul Bean / Elizabeth Dudney2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMegan Frederick / Margaret Menear vs Cheryl Vann / Lacey Tober6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMichelle Patterson / Maggie Riggs vs Kiley Leonard / Vanessa Vey2-6, 5-7
2025-11-13vs Couch -PCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesKacee Bidnick / Maggie Riggs vs PATRICIA Ghiglino / Sandra Ling4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJill Wilson / Margaret Menear vs Antonia Starzmann / Madyson Stacker6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMarianna Massey / Ashley Butler vs Joy Huber / Hannah Coggin6-3, 6-2
2025-10-16vs Ratliff - RS HardWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle Patterson / Ashley Butler vs Skye Matthews / Susan Davis6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMargaret Menear / Savannah Wilson vs Monika Greene / Lisa Streete6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMarianna Massey / Candy Zuleger vs Sara Ratliff / Katherine Ross6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Lauren Burch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Jill Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Leigh Diamond
published
2.75
Marianna Massey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.72
Kacee Bidnick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Candy Zuleger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Margaret Menear
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Sheree Lombardo
published
2.48
Maggie Riggs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Janice Clark
published
Michelle Patterson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Savannah Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Menear + Jill Wilson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Burch
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.11
Jill Wilson
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Leigh Diamond
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Marianna Massey
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
Kacee Bidnick
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Candy Zuleger
16W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
20%79%<1%
2.62
Margaret Menear
18W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
Sheree Lombardo
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
Maggie Riggs
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
Janice Clark
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Patterson
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Savannah Wilson
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.