Teams

Smith

2021 OKCMixed 18 & Over League · 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.44 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-22vs OK/Casey-Thagard/MXD18&over7.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLogan Edens / Jacqualine Bufford vs Jeff Berry / Tamara Cromwell6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAntonio Wells / LAINEY CAMFIELD vs Craig Hays / Tiffany Palmer1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Ward / Jo Smith vs Mark Shuck / Melinda Parsons4-6, 1-6
2021-06-20vs Ace Holes 7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJo Smith / Brian Ward vs Seth Fitter / Sarai Baird7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEric Saak / Heather Herndon vs Tim Nelson / Lizzie Nelson1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Bogert / Shane Washburn vs Olivier Bouzerand / Susan Bouzerand6-2, 6-2
2021-06-06vs Greens 7.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesLogan Edens / Jacqualine Bufford vs Timothy Ramseyer / Michelle Dugan6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesElba Sisco / Heath Herndon vs Patrick Doughty / Teresa Ledlow1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHeather Herndon / Eric Saak vs Hayden Kaaiohelo / Jessica Bello7-6, 7-5
2021-05-09vs OK/Casey-Thagard/MXD18&over7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesShane Washburn / Jennifer Bogert vs Craig Hays / Tiffany Palmer0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLogan Edens / Jacqualine Bufford vs Jeff Berry / Erin Wood6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDaniel Gassen / Jo Smith vs Greg Burge / Melinda Parsons3-6, 2-6
2021-05-02vs Ace Holes 7.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesJackie Nazim / Eric Nazim vs H Johnson / Kay Peters6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Bogert / Logan Edens vs Becky Johnson / Seth Fitter6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAntonio Wells / LAINEY CAMFIELD vs William Liedtke / MacHelle Wright6-4, 6-4
2021-04-18vs Greens 7.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesJacqualine Bufford / Logan Edens vs Rachell Mariano / Tony Mullican6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesShane Washburn / Jennifer Bogert vs Timothy Ramseyer / Amanda Johnson2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJackie Nazim / Eric Nazim vs Janna Hefley-Wade / Hayden Kaaiohelo6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Jacqualine Bufford
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Heath Herndon
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.41
Heather Herndon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.34
Logan Edens
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.32
Brian Ward
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Eric Nazim
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.92
Jo Smith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Antonio Wells
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.80
Elba Sisco
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.73
Jennifer Bogert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.69
Jackie Nazim
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Daniel Gassen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Eric Saak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
LAINEY CAMFIELD
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Shane Washburn
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqualine Bufford + Logan Edens5161% games+8.2% vs expected
Jo Smith + Brian Ward141450% games+3.7% vs expected
Heather Herndon + Jacqualine Bufford7354% games+3.6% vs expected
Heather Herndon + Antonio Wells4446% games+1.9% vs expected
Jackie Nazim + Eric Nazim122744% games+0.7% vs expected
Eric Nazim + Jo Smith6750% games−2.9% vs expected
Jo Smith + Jennifer Bogert1534% games−8.3% vs expected
Heather Herndon + Heath Herndon41636% games−9.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jacqualine Bufford
85W–71L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Heath Herndon
19W–39L career · type M · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Heather Herndon
100W–149L career · 10 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
Logan Edens
40W–32L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Brian Ward
111W–109L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Eric Nazim
101W–141L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
Jo Smith
132W–145L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Antonio Wells
23W–32L career · type S · 2 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Elba Sisco
89W–110L career · 7 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.80
Jennifer Bogert
49W–104L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Jackie Nazim
129W–136L career · 2 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
Daniel Gassen
1W–12L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Eric Saak
9W–17L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
LAINEY CAMFIELD
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Shane Washburn
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.