Teams

*1-JMontague-Eno-3.5

2024 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Wknd

9 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-25vs *2-JByrd-EnoLost 12
W#2 DoublesJAMES MONTAGUE / Conor Kregecz vs Conner Garrison / David Nenon5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesArash Chehrazi vs Nikita Poujai0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRyan Stewart / Francisco Burbano vs Christopher Green / Jeffrey Zhou0-6, 0-6
2024-04-17Won 20
W#1 SinglesArash Chehrazi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesZach Rowles / Owen Daly vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-11vs *6-MLong-EnoWon 21
W#1 DoublesArash Chehrazi / Conor O'Neill vs Austin Gardner / Charlie Foster6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesZach Rowles / Owen Daly vs Joe Park / Christopher Rogge3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesConor Kregecz vs Elias Peters6-3, 6-2
2024-04-04vs *7-DRobinson-EnoWon 30
W#1 SinglesConor Kregecz vs Greg Fitts6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesArash Chehrazi vs Ethan Holston6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesFrancisco Burbano / Michael Ratliff vs Jeff Franklin / Carlos Torres6-2, 6-1
2024-03-14vs *4-CMoffitt-EnoLost 02
L#1 SinglesConor Kregecz vs AUSTIN LEONARD6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesZach Rowles / Jimmy Mattila vs Devon DiPalma / Tanner Dellinger3-6, 6-7
2024-02-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesZach Rowles / Owen Daly vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-02-22vs *8-ELanghans -EnoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesArash Chehrazi / Conor Kregecz vs Eric Langhans / Jacob McLennan7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesFrancisco Burbano / Michael Ratliff vs Tom Petersen / Andrew Burd2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Wknd have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Schumann
published 4
3.60
Conor Kregecz
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.48
Michael Ratliff
published
3.36
JAMES MONTAGUE
published
3.35
Zach Rowles
usually #3 Doubles 30%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.33
Arash Chehrazi
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
Conor O'Neill
published 3.5
3.15
Francisco Burbano
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Owen Daly
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Francisco Burbano + Michael Ratliff213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Schumann
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Conor Kregecz
69W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.60
Michael Ratliff
23W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.48
JAMES MONTAGUE
17W–28L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Zach Rowles
107W–61L career · 9 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Arash Chehrazi
87W–56L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Conor O'Neill
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Francisco Burbano
79W–81L career · 3 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
Owen Daly
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.