Teams

Cartee 8.5 Combo 40s Thurs

2023 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 8.5 40 & Over Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-17vs Brown K 8.5 Combo 40s ThursWon 10
W#1 DoublesFuyuka Lynch / Amy Beth Kessinger vs Tammy Dickenson / Kathy Hedgecock5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-09-14vs Oldis 8.5 Combo 40s thursLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmy Beth Kessinger / Carrie McElvogue vs Joanna Cox / Elizabeth Gill1-6, 4-6
2023-08-24Won 10
W#3 DoublesMimi Cartee / Erin Huffines vs Leah Price / Lee Manring7-6, 7-5
2023-08-17vs Scott/Priest 8.5 Combo 40s ThursLost 01
L#1 DoublesMimi Cartee / Erin Huffines vs Karen Regan / Keevie Martin4-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesMimi Cartee / Erin Huffines vs Beverly Tuttle / Dabney Porter3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeigh Abraham / Amy Beth Kessinger vs Bonnie Satterfield / Julie Spence6-0, 6-3
2023-08-12vs Milam 8.5 Combo 40s ThursWon 10
W#3 DoublesAmy Beth Kessinger / Catherine Stopka vs Cookie Guarini / Mary Beth Ebert6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Amy Beth Kessinger
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.84
Erin Huffines
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.82
Leigh Abraham
published
3.76
Catherine Stopka
published 4
3.67
Mimi Cartee
published
3.67
Heidi Wrisley
published 4
3.63
3.43
Carrie McElvogue
published 4
Janel Green
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Stopka + Carrie McElvogue033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amy Beth Kessinger
82W–40L career · 7 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
4.05
4
Erin Huffines
173W–130L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.84
Leigh Abraham
30W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Catherine Stopka
10W–17L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.76
Mimi Cartee
17W–17L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Heidi Wrisley
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Carol Schuck Dillon
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Carrie McElvogue
4W–23L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.43
Janel Green
18W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.