Teams

Cartee 40s 8.5 Combo W Thurs PM

2025 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 8.5 40 & Over Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.93 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-08-07vs Nutt 40s 8.5 Combo W Thurs PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesRolinde Cleyman / Kristi Collins vs Beth Harris / Marla Barnwell1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRobin Johnson / Catherine Stopka vs Cari Powell / Beth Mayer1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDabney Porter / Carrie McElvogue vs Lindsay Ray / Tara Burgio3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Kristi Collins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Heidi Wrisley
published
3.77
Beverly Tuttle
published 4
April Wilson
published 4
3.75
Mimi Cartee
published
3.74
Dabney Porter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Catherine Stopka
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Carol Schuck Dillon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Melissa Goodman
published
3.53
Bonnie Satterfield
published 3.5
3.44
Carrie McElvogue
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.31
Rolinde Cleyman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Goodman + Bonnie Satterfield10267% games+10.7% vs expected
Beverly Tuttle + Catherine Stopka4448% games−3.2% vs expected
Beverly Tuttle + Dabney Porter3640% games−7.0% vs expected
Dabney Porter + Kristi Collins134 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Stopka + Carrie McElvogue033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristi Collins
6W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.91
Heidi Wrisley
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.81
4
Beverly Tuttle
15W–17L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
April Wilson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mimi Cartee
16W–16L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Dabney Porter
12W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Catherine Stopka
9W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Carol Schuck Dillon
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.63
Melissa Goodman
41W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Bonnie Satterfield
17W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.53
4
Carrie McElvogue
4W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.44
Rolinde Cleyman
5W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.