Teams

WTiedeman (OPRC)

2025 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over 8.5 Men - Wed PM

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesJay Tiedeman / Duncan Thompson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-24vs MDriscoll/BHofmann (Lifetime)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJim Waud / Jay Tiedeman vs Bob Hofmann / Roger Gum2-6, 3-6
2025-09-17vs SSwanson (Palisades)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJay Tiedeman / Jim Waud vs Kevin Green / Barry Bonikowski6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2025-09-10vs RBredder (Carmel)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJay Tiedeman / Jim Waud vs Rod Spence / Bryan Skelton6-7, 4-6
2025-09-03Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJay Tiedeman / Mario Gonzalez vs Scott Nichols / Jason Freeman6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-08-27vs BBrupbacher (WSRC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesGilbert Browne / Wade Farrow vs Jeremy Caslin / Randall Miller2-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 8.5 Men - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Jay Tiedeman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.24
John Deering
published
3.90
Wade Farrow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Sean Hickey
published
3.68
Duncan Thompson
published
3.50
Jim Waud
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Hunt Allen
published
Jon Nee
published
Mario Gonzalez
published
Stephen Kennen
published
Trip Caldwell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jim Waud + Jay Tiedeman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jay Tiedeman
48W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
4.35
John Deering
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.24
4
Wade Farrow
23W–26L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
Sean Hickey
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Duncan Thompson
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Jim Waud
33W–47L career · 3 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Hunt Allen
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jon Nee
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mario Gonzalez
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephen Kennen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Trip Caldwell
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.