Teams

TOC.Li

2025 CTRL Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-07vs TOC.LevineWon 10
W#4 DoublesLirong Zhao / Li Chen vs Kristen Levine / Jessica Williams7-5, 6-4
2025-05-03vs ACP.TandradinataSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLirong Zhao / Nan Hu vs Mary Jo Dunnington / Kelly Johnson1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLusia Li vs Najia Cheema6-2, 6-4
2025-04-05vs TING.RayWon 10
W#4 DoublesLusia Li / Li Chen vs Robyn Merck / Christine Rowe6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-29vs TOC.KempfLost 02
L#1 DoublesLirong Zhao / Nan Hu vs Lorraine Hall / Laurie Reiss7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLusia Li / Shirley Kim vs Marina Barthalmus / Nicole Peterson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-22vs CAS.ShafferSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLirong Zhao / Nan Hu vs Erin Wynia / Shannon Littleton6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLusia Li / Shirley Kim vs Nicole Shaffer / Joanne Kearney2-6, 5-7
2025-03-15vs LOCH.PeltWon 20
W#1 DoublesShirley Kim / Lirong Zhao vs Kara Hornada / Wendy Hanshew7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNan Hu / Lusia Li vs Lindsay Stover / Ana Maria Fernandez Serrat6-1, 7-5
2025-03-08vs TOC.IrishWon 10
W#2 DoublesLusia Li / Lirong Zhao vs Regina Davis / Jennifer Magee6-1, 6-2
2025-03-01vs KF.HaireWon 20
W#2 DoublesNan Hu / Lirong Zhao vs Nancy Haire / Brenda Steele6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesShirley Kim / Lusia Li vs Alice Schoots / Virginia Lewis6-4, 7-5
2025-02-22vs MD.ScrogginsWon 20
W#1 DoublesNan Hu / Lirong Zhao vs Jennifer Moses / Angie Bostrom6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesShirley Kim / Lusia Li vs Carolyn Ulrich / Hillary Parnell6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Lirong Zhao
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.48
Lusia Li
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.46
Meimei Wessinger
published
3.44
Lijun Chen
published
3.42
Nan Hu
published
3.31
Emily Yang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Yang + Lusia Li5170% games+15.0% vs expected
Lirong Zhao + Nan Hu224 matchesnot enough data
Emily Yang + Nan Hu213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lirong Zhao
28W–16L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Lusia Li
65W–54L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
Meimei Wessinger
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Lijun Chen
22W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Nan Hu
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Emily Yang
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.