Teams

Hammond

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 LADIES

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-29vs IvyLost 03
L#1 DoublesDenise Leard / Denise Litherland vs Brianna Guerra / Shawntae Moeller0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDelphine Hittson / Kinsley Stepka vs Cenee Precure / Martha Schroeder2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary Jane Hammond / Donna Sellers vs Lynn Rush / Esmeralda Ivy2-6, 2-6
2025-04-08vs IvyLost 04
L#1 DoublesDenise Leard / Anastacia Nix vs Holly Creech / Courtney Vanderham3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMary Jane Hammond vs Esmeralda Ivy0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaci Bohn / Kinsley Stepka vs Brianna Guerra / Jennifer Moore1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSridevi Veeramachaneni / Denise Litherland vs Cenee Precure / Paulette Sturdivant0-6, 0-6
2025-03-18vs IvyLost 04
L#1 DoublesDenise Litherland / Kaci Bohn vs Brianna Guerra / Jessica Needham1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAnastacia Nix vs Esmeralda Ivy3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMary Jane Hammond / Delphine Hittson vs Courtney Vanderham / Holly Creech0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDenise Leard / Donna Sellers vs Cenee Precure / Lynn Rush2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 LADIES have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Anastacia Nix
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.48
Delphine Hittson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Sridevi Veeramachaneni
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Kinsley Stepka
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Denise Leard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Crystal Melton
published 3.5
3.15
Mary Jane Hammond
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.14
Kaci Bohn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
Denise Litherland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Donna Sellers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kaci Bohn + Kinsley Stepka033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anastacia Nix
15W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.65
3.5
Delphine Hittson
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
Sridevi Veeramachaneni
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Kinsley Stepka
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Denise Leard
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Crystal Melton
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Jane Hammond
5W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Kaci Bohn
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Denise Litherland
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
Donna Sellers
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.