Teams

McMullen King 55

2024 Pinellas Adult 55 & Over Weekend Winter · 8.0 M Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-16vs Safety Harbor BanditosSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMark Wolfson / John Holland vs Christopher Hollingsworth / Andrew Newman6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRobert Ironsmith / Mark Nasworthy vs Steven Rattner / Michael Laccabue3-6, 2-6
2024-02-24vs Safety Harbor BanditosWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid King / Dane Houston vs Michael Laccabue / Steven Rattner2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-02-24vs Pinellas/Hutton/55&Over8.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesCHRISTOPHER THOMPSON / Mark Nasworthy vs Monty Johnson / Chuck Goldberg2-6, 0-6
2024-02-03vs Pinellas/Hutton/55&Over8.0MLost 01
L#3 DoublesJohn Holland / Mark Wolfson vs Sebastian Brust / Monty Johnson2-6, 1-6
2024-01-20vs Pinellas/Hutton/55&Over8.0MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBill Allen / Dane Houston vs Sebastian Brust / Monty Johnson3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCraig Hajdich / Mark Nasworthy vs Chris Eversole / Jack Davis7-5, 7-6
2024-01-13vs Safety Harbor BanditosLost 02
L#1 DoublesDane Houston / Rob Tenney vs Ray Pasinski / Gorban Aliak4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMark Wolfson / John Holland vs Bill Calafiura / Steven Rattner4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
3.77
Albert Alhadeff
published 4
3.59
Dane Houston
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.37
Bill Allen
published 4
3.27
Mark Nasworthy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
John Holland
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Wolfson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Martin Black
published
Robert Ironsmith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Wolfson + John Holland6947% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON
4W–13L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
4.06
4
Albert Alhadeff
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Dane Houston
155W–186L career · 4 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Bill Allen
20W–10L career · no lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
3.37
3.5
Mark Nasworthy
114W–79L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
John Holland
60W–63L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Wolfson
62W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Martin Black
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Ironsmith
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.