Teams

Jennifer Jackson

2021 Forty West Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over Women 4.0

3 players · average NTRP 4.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2021-07-17vs JLee 4.0 40+ 40WESTLost 01
L#1 DoublesQuynh Tran / Wendy Heger vs Nannette Littlejohn / Tatiana Loboda3-6, 6-7
2021-06-10vs JLee 4.0 40+ 40WESTLost 01
L#2 DoublesWendy Heger / Dina Bruzek vs Malika Rasheed / Pamela Dean5-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Wendy Heger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.28
Lynn Gorman
published
3.22
Teresa Adams
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Wendy Heger
142W–188L career · 2 lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
4.02
Lynn Gorman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.28
Teresa Adams
11W–7L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.